Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

USA Today's Predictions for each division


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Man some of you guys get butthurt over anything.

No bold predictions?

Chargers winning the super bowl, falcons winning the south and beating brees (most generic writers choose the saints), 49ers and Vikings come back and take their division, Cardinals get 3 wins and finish last even with their new toys and a coach familiar with the new QB?

I mean there are some bold predictions in here and I like the prediction. It’s pretty spot on considering everything that went on last season and a few surprises so what happened on the off season. I don’t think Chargers will win it all but they have a a situation to have a chance.

I wouldn’t bet against most of this at the end of the year being pretty accurate.

As for the Panthers no one knows about Cams shoulder so 8-8 pretty much signs that. Could be better could be worse all depending on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really see no problem here. Y'all bout to get mad, but the Chargers winning is a yes for me. As for us at 8-8, it makes a lot of sense. Would I want both teams at 12-4? absolutely and to meet. There are WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too many questions here, and hell Burns isn't signed yet. We still have no safety other than what's being fed. How'd that work out for Kevin Seymour experiment? Our best bet is to keep everyone healthy, give Will Grier as many reps as possible in the preseason and keep Cam off the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Never underestimate how dumb our owner is.
    • people out here crapping on front office decisions and then propose we get daniel jones to save us. incredible.  
    • I don't agree the offensive players were his choice, when his head coach has a total offensive background and given the situation. I view it like... FA, Morgan's job on Offensive guys was probably the nuts and bolts, the mechanics of making the trade or deal or signing happen. Seeing if we could swing it, having discussions about it with Canales, Tilis, and Tepper too no doubt.  He would have done the wheeling and dealing and turning the cards in to make those things happen. But would you ask him or would you ask Canales who is building the offense, to choose offensive players? I mean, Canales all the way for me. Defensive players, Canales probably wouldn't overrule Morgan. Now, it was apparent that he was indulging Evero on some of those acquisitions. But isn't he sort of supposed to collaborate with the coaches in charge of that side of the ball?  Wallace looked not too great yesterday but he was really thrown into a raging fire, so I am not out on him. But I was irritated and dismayed at his seeming lack of disappointment in the loss when I saw his postgame locker room minutes.  I need to see things with Young out of the picture and not influencing every fuging decision. 
×
×
  • Create New...