Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF ranks Panthers o-line in top 10


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

So I don't keep up with it much, but I thought I heard about how much money and draft capital the Falcons had put into their OL over the past few years. They are ranked 22nd? 

Don't get me wrong. I hope that is true (or even too high)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly hope that it proves to be accurate. The OL has a lot of potential, but significant potential pitfalls as well. LG is still a concern as is the health of Williams and to a lesser extent Paradis. I have no idea what to expect out of Little as a rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers Oline rank according to PFF since Cam's career;

2011 - 7th

2012 - 27th

2013 - 7th

2014 - 22nd

2015 - 2nd

2016 - 17th

2017 - 10th

2018 - 17th

Average rated oline over Cam's career: 13th (16th is 'average').

I think it's suffice to say there are a lot of over reactors on this forum about the offensive line. No doubt there have been some real bad players and dumb moves (or lack thereof) by the FO, but all in all some teams (19 out of 32 to be exact) have averaged worse olines in the league than the Panthers since 2011.

It's not too shabby, especially if you consider than these measurements are skewed by QBs like Brady and Brees who always have higher graded offensive lines due to the fact of how quickly they get rid of the ball.

I will also say that going back 15 years worth of superbowls it was very very rare either team had an oline ranked below 10, showing just how important an offensive line is. A miserable fun fact: the 2015 Broncos were the most recent of one of those very rare examples and were ranked 20th.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

Seems a lot of pundits are saying Little will start this season at LT.  I hope he can win the job, but it easily be that Daryl plays, or at least starts the season at LT while Little starts at guard.

Why? Has he ever played LT before? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

Why? Has he ever played LT before? 

don't know, but I know RR would rather play vets over rookies, even 2nd rounders.  We'll see.  By the end of camp if Little is our starting LT, it's a good sign that we believe in him.  Still a little scary though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On paper this group does inspire a lot more optimism than we have had in quite a few years. 

Paradis, Turner, and Moton all have proven Pro-Bowl talent.  Williams was showing that as well before his injury.  Little is an unknown, but the team obviously seems very high on him.

Van Roten and Larsen are quality backups.  Dennis Daley (7th Rounder) is raw but also has upside.

It feels good to have depth across the offensive line.  Too many times under Rivera, we have had average to subpar starting offensive lineman and little-to-no depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Lumps said:

Panthers Oline rank according to PFF since Cam's career;

2011 - 7th

2012 - 27th

2013 - 7th

2014 - 22nd

2015 - 2nd

2016 - 17th

2017 - 10th

2018 - 17th

Average rated oline over Cam's career: 13th (16th is 'average').

I think it's suffice to say there are a lot of over reactors on this forum about the offensive line. No doubt there have been some real bad players and dumb moves (or lack thereof) by the FO, but all in all some teams (19 out of 32 to be exact) have averaged worse olines in the league than the Panthers since 2011.

It's not too shabby, especially if you consider than these measurements are skewed by QBs like Brady and Brees who always have higher graded offensive lines due to the fact of how quickly they get rid of the ball.

I will also say that going back 15 years worth of superbowls it was very very rare either team had an oline ranked below 10, showing just how important an offensive line is. A miserable fun fact: the 2015 Broncos were the most recent of one of those very rare examples and were ranked 20th.

 

 

All that shows is there’s  lot of over reactors to the validity of PFF rankings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Captain Morgan said:

Seems a lot of pundits are saying Little will start this season at LT.  I hope he can win the job, but it easily be that Daryl plays, or at least starts the season at LT while Little starts at guard.

If Daryl ends up at LT then things have gone terribly wrong.  

At best he’s a RT that needs help.  

Best case scenario is little, moton, paradise, suckafree (turner), williams 

I know most of y’all wanna see moton play Rt but he’d be a monster as a rg in the run game.  I don’t think Daryl can move well enough to do it.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Lumps said:

Panthers Oline rank according to PFF since Cam's career;

2011 - 7th

2012 - 27th

2013 - 7th

2014 - 22nd

2015 - 2nd

2016 - 17th

2017 - 10th

2018 - 17th

Average rated oline over Cam's career: 13th (16th is 'average').

I think it's suffice to say there are a lot of over reactors on this forum about the offensive line. No doubt there have been some real bad players and dumb moves (or lack thereof) by the FO, but all in all some teams (19 out of 32 to be exact) have averaged worse olines in the league than the Panthers since 2011.

It's not too shabby, especially if you consider than these measurements are skewed by QBs like Brady and Brees who always have higher graded offensive lines due to the fact of how quickly they get rid of the ball.

I will also say that going back 15 years worth of superbowls it was very very rare either team had an oline ranked below 10, showing just how important an offensive line is. A miserable fun fact: the 2015 Broncos were the most recent of one of those very rare examples and were ranked 20th.

 

 

It's PFF. This just shows how awful their metric is. Did we look like the 2nd best offensive line in the super bowl? Why does PFF continue to come up. I just wish ESPN would buy them out and take over their system or just abolish altogether. Our line can't open holes for poo, and left tackle protection has been mostly non-existent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, everyone here thinks a second round LT is the immediate plug-in answer for LT. Cam better sit out the preseason altogether or he'll be forced to. Let me repeat myself. A SECOND ROUND LEFT TACKLE THAT ONLY HURNEY PLUGGED AS A FIRST ROUND GRADE OUT OF ALL OTHER GM'S THAT HE TRADED UP FOR IS OUR FRANCHISE ANSWER AT LEFT TACKLE TO PROTECT OUR ALREADY FRAGILE QB AND NEXT ROOKIE QB.

They better move Moton over, this is the correct solution and leave van roten at LG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...