Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Soccer....

SCP

By SCP,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
Posted

Cesc is the best young player in the world. That goal he had at the end of the half was an instant classic. They're making a mockery of Tottenham. I just hope we can fend Real Madrid off for another couple of years from taking him...

Real Madrid = New York Yankees

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shinner Newbie

shinner

Posted
Posted

I just saw 3 in the Top 10 plays on SportsCenter. So buy your own metrics, you're wrong.

Maybe it was a slow day in sports? Hell, they've had things in the top 10 plays that barely qualified as sport.

My problem with baseball is there is 200 f**king games!

What about soccer though? You have your league games, then you have a couple different cups...then you have the champions league and if you bounce out of that, you go into the uefa cup (don't think they do that anymore). There are a ton of soccer games. Not 200 f**cking games but then again, they're very different sports and the pace of the game dictates the amount of games played.

And baseball isn't? You didn't make up a baseball field in the neighborhood?

Make up a field? We played in the freakin' street. Ok, we also had an empty lot but we spent just as much time playing in the street (basically stickball or bounceball).

one big reason why soccer is not as accepted in the USA is that there are many many nations in the world that are far superior at the game.

Then we should be dropping out of baseball very soon as the game is dominated by foreign players and we've won jack squat in the WBC. In 5 years of Olympic baseball, we won once. We suck at soccer because no one cares about it...and the small percentage that do, can't generate a team of players that can compete on an international level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bobby Newbie

Bobby

Posted
Posted

Maybe it was a slow day in sports? Hell, they've had things in the top 10 plays that barely qualified as sport.

They just dropped a pooload of money into Premier League and La Liga rights, actually.

What about soccer though? You have your league games, then you have a couple different cups...then you have the champions league and if you bounce out of that, you go into the uefa cup (don't think they do that anymore). There are a ton of soccer games. Not 200 f**cking games but then again, they're very different sports and the pace of the game dictates the amount of games played.

Different competitions. If baseball had a Champions League, that'd be different. Of course, MLB teams don't see a good reason (read: afraid of what might happen if they lose) to play the Japanese champion, despite the Japanese champion issuing a challenge more than once. In fact, Bobby Valentine tried to get the White Sox to play his Chiba team, they didn't even give him an answer.

We suck at soccer because no one cares about it...and the small percentage that do, can't generate a team of players that can compete on an international level.

Soccer has more players than baseball, actually. Does that mean no one cares about baseball? I just hope you aren't equating domestic league TV ratings and stadium attendance to success internationally.

Nobody watches the Brazilian league, not even Brazilians unless it's a derby match. Hundreds of millions of people watch the Premier League and La Liga yet between them England and Spain have mustered one World Cup title. One. Brazil has five. Spain has never even reached a World Cup final, England did once -- when they won it in 1966.

TV ratings for soccer have nothing to do with our lack of international success at it. We're wildly successful at men's volleyball -- to the tune of three Olympic titles and a bronze, do you know any one with season tickets to it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shinner Newbie

shinner

Posted
Posted

They just dropped a shitload of money into Premier League and La Liga rights, actually.

Then I really question the inclusion of so many soccer highlights in the top plays. Seems clear that they're trying to generate interest in the sport because of their financial stake in it. Wouldn't be the first time. ESPN has all but dropped reporting on hockey as a result of their not renewing their contract to broadcast games.

Different competitions.

True but I was pointing out that there is no lack of soccer games for teams to play in. They play a shitload of games. Doesn't matter that they're different competitions, it was a comment that baseball has 200 f**king games (which in itself is a small exaggeration).

Soccer has more players than baseball, actually. Does that mean no one cares about baseball? I just hope you aren't equating domestic league TV ratings and stadium attendance to success internationally.

I wasn't basing success on either of those. More kids in the US play soccer than baseball? Really?

Nobody watches the Brazilian league, not even Brazilians unless it's a derby match. Hundreds of millions of people watch the Premier League and La Liga yet between them England and Spain have mustered one World Cup title. One. Brazil has five. Spain has never even reached a World Cup final, England did once -- when they won it in 1966.

BUT...in all of those countries soccer can be considered their national pastime (or at least the equivalent of one). Every kid grows up watching, idolizing and playing the game. Maybe not literally "every" kid but probably well over 90%. Here, you'd be lucky to have that number approach 9%.

You could pick non-sports fans off the street and I bet a huge majority could tell you the name of a baseball, basketball or football player (hockey, I'm not 100% sure on though I bet most could muster up Gretzky or Lemieux). My bet is that very few could name a member of the USA soccer team.

We're just not a soccer country and we never will be. No matter what the soccer lovers say, the thrill of heading in a corner kick will never approach a home run with 2 outs in the bottom of the 9th or a drive down the field in the last 2 minutes of the 4th quarter. Just won't.

BTW - I'm not anti-soccer....I'm just realistic about it's place in American sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NAS
      Panthers coverage efficiency

      By NAS · Posted

      Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • NAS
      The Bryce Young "Game Winning Drive" narrative needs to end

      By NAS · Posted

      Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • TD alt
      Drafting X is like the poster board for mistakes. Hopefully, lesson learned.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...