Will CMC become new face of Panthers

[JawnyBlaze]

Sure maybe when Cam retires. Even then it would probably be Luke first if he outlasts Cam, though an offensive player would probably have an advantage so it could be CMC

[Jesse]

That's like asking if AD is the face of the Lakers. He's good. But he ain't Bron good.

[thefuzz]

1 hour ago, TheRed said:

You quoted me and brought up Gurley. The offensive juggernaut that was the 2019 Rams were almost shut out in the lowest scoring Super Bowl in history. My initial statement which you quoted holds up.

Ask our team if they give a poo about merely appearing in the Super Bowl only to watch it slip away despite still being in it down to the last few minutes of the game.

There isn't a team in the league that can win a title with only an RB as the face of their team. Just ask Sean McVay and Jared Goff.

Both the Broncos and Patriots beat the Rams and the Panthers with stout pass rush.

What on Earth are you talking about?  Are you drunk?

You said that no teams are going to be successful with a RB as the face of the franchise.  I would say that an NFC team with a RB as the face was a lot more successful than we were last year, and you bring up rushing totals from the SB?

Confusing as hell.

 

[TheRed]

37 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

What on Earth are you talking about?  Are you drunk?

You said that no teams are going to be successful with a RB as the face of the franchise.  I would say that an NFC team with a RB as the face was a lot more successful than we were last year, and you bring up rushing totals from the SB?

Confusing as hell.

 

Since when is winning a championship not the goal of every NFL franchise every single season? When it mattered most did Gurley get them over the hump or did they falter?

My initial post stated "if your RB is the face of your franchise, you probably aren't winning much". How do you get from that to saying no teams at all will be successful whatsoever? That's not what was posted. Have you asked yourself why the Rams are the only example you could think of?

If it's "confusing as hell", that's because you are making it that way.

Don't be a dick.

[darrybear]

4 hours ago, jbland said:

Was thinking the exact same thing. 

Aww adorable baby  and co-sign on original post 

[panthers55]

McCaffrey won't become the face of the franchise because he is quiet and self deprecating and humble. That doesn't make news or make you popular. Cam .is a big personality and will.be the face of the franchise as long as he is the starting QB. It is the same reason Kuechly is well known and a leader but not the face of the franchise.

[PantherPhann89]

8 hours ago, TheRed said:

If your RB is the face of your franchise in the modern NFL, you probably aren't winning much. Harsh truth.

NY Giants...

[Jon Snow]

What happened to the old face?

[KendrickPanther]

Luke Kuechly has been a better linebacker than Cam has been a QB. Luke Kuechly has been a better linebacker than CMC has been a RB. And still all this time, Cam has been the face of the franchise. If Cam can overshadow Luke, he can overshadow anyone.

[L-TownCat]

[Rubi]

Cam - the face until he’s retired

sigh. Was watching some YouTube from 2015 season. Cam was absolute dynamite that year. His arm was insanely good that season

[jbland]

14 hours ago, darrybear said:

Aww adorable baby  and co-sign on original post 

Suck.A.Dick. 

[stratopanther]

Sean mcvay is the face of the rams franchise weirdly enough.

[Trill OG]

No.

The last rb to be the face of the franchise was Adrian Peterson when he was drafted by the Vikings. Love CM, but he is not that type of rb. The face of a franchise will be a QB 50% of the time. RB's don't hold enough value in today's league to be the face of a franchise.