Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This sounds about right ( Post-McCoy Power Rankings).


Recommended Posts

Walterfootball released his latest power rankings today.  The fact we have ranged from 26 to 7 on different sites tells you have much Cam's health means to this team (not that that's news to anyone here).  

 

7. panthersb_logo.gif Carolina Panthers (7-9) - Previously: 12. 
The Panthers are the most difficult team to rank at the moment because we don't know what Cam Newton's status is going to be. There's some long-term concerns with Newton's shoulder, so there's a chance he may not be 100 percent in 2019. If Newton is healthy, the team could win the Super Bowl next year, thanks to the upgrade the front office made at center. Conversely, the Panthers will be locked into a losing record again if Newton is banged up. 

Update: I've heard that Cam Newton is healthy, so I was already willing to bump up the Panthers. Then, they signed Gerald McCoy. Carolina deserves to be a top-10 team, and it certainly is worth the 60/1 Super Bowl odds. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am really ignoring all Panther rankings.They are never really fair to Carolina.  Even during the 2015 run I was swamped with stories online and on ESPN, etc like "Worst 8-1 team ever?"

We know the team we have.  We know it will rely greatly on Cam's shoulder.  I am content to sit back and let it play out.  Rather fly in under the radar anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

I am really ignoring all Panther rankings.They are never really fair to Carolina.  Even during the 2015 run I was swamped with stories online and on ESPN, etc like "Worst 8-1 team ever?"

We know the team we have.  We know it will rely greatly on Cam's shoulder.  I am content to sit back and let it play out.  Rather fly in under the radar anyways.

In 2015 we were never 8-1.  We were 8-0 and 9-0 but never 8-1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bababoey said:

In 2015 we were never 8-1.  We were 8-0 and 9-0 but never 8-1

Sorry, my memory was fuzzy on when the loss was.  But the point remains.  There were constant articles about how we were the worst 5-0, 6-0, 7-0, etc in nfl history.  At one point the power rankings had 1 loss teams ahead of us, I believe at the week 6ish mark.

Any other team, they'd be celebrating how well they started.  Panthers?  Gotta find a negative spin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, electro's horse said:

Rams are weird. There's fear BB exposed them, Suh is gone, the rest of the defense is a year older, and Gurley is dead.

I think there's probably a lot to them getting exposed by belichik. It was the system and Gurley that made them so potent and then Gurley turned to mush and the system got figured out and it looks like the template might be pretty easy to copy. It all depends on a relatively new HC being able to go back to the drawing board and come up with a new angle....probably without their star RB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Week 1 against the Rams will be a major barometer for this team.  Even with losing some guys, this is still an incredibly talented team coached by a great offensive mind in McVay and a great defensive guy in Wade Phillips who was the only guy to slow Newton down during his MVP run in 2015.

This will be a great opportunity to see how we stack up against the reigning NFC Champion and where our place among the NFC hierarchy will be to start the season. Winning or losing won't be the end-all for the season, but winning will show the national media we will be a force to reckon with in 2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Film Room Playlist _ NFL Pro — Mozilla Firefox 2024-11-25 10-20-11.mp4 🎯🎯🎯 There were a couple of "fans" yesterday saying that this wasn't a helmet-to-helmet shot... 👀 Looks like based on where Moore was and where the play ended, he'd have gotten maybe just a yard or two more. Chuba was downed at the KC 16 and Moore was on his way back to the QB, so the offense got what they could for the most part. After reviewing the all-22, Bryce made the right call here. Tremble was the hot and KC sent both LBs. He gets it out with a clear pocket but it's quickly collapsing. If there was a little more time it looked like AT came free at the end but whether or not Bryce would've been upright still is another story. Smart move to get the completion and keep the field goal in play to stay alive. George Karlaftis is about to get himself a big ole hug and Bryce heaves it to where David Moore is going. Trent McDuffie slipped just a step or two before this shot, but we can see the clear DPI here as he's wrapped around David Moore before knocking him over as the ball gets there.
    • I’m taking a TE early day 3 Ian Thomas and Tremble are FA.  We should have no desire to bring them back.   There’s more than enough film of ball bouncing off their hands or facemask.
    • Daniel Jones sometimes would sling it for 300 or 400 yards.  That's my stance.  We know what Bryce is.  If you consistently play any QB at this level, they largely are going to end up w/ some good days/games.  last time Mahomes was at BOA, Teddy Bridgwater threw for 300+ yards and a couple TDs and the Matt Rhule Panthers almost took him down.  We know what Bryce is.  Now we got people predictably falling into a predictable trap. 
×
×
  • Create New...