Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Start Moore But


Guest RT81

Recommended Posts

Wait till Sunday morning to make its offical.that way arizona would be totally off guard and would not know what to do since they been looking at film of jake all week.

what you guys think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything but start delhomme....I need to win my underwear bet with AK damnit!

If Matt Starts you win the bet.I think Matt would play smart,spread the ball around and our running game does the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The person who makes the least mistakes should start. Jake has shown he's incapable of doing so. Arizona has sack-fumbled Jake when we've been backed up TWICE in two straight games. Arizona has the #1 rushing defense according to yards per game. We WILL have to effectively pass the ball to set up the run. Whoever starts will just have to complete passes to the open guy and make the defense respect the passing game.

Jake is the absolute worst option to start this game and I know there's a possibility considering John Fox's loyalty and probably someone like AKPanther would hang a banner saying start Jake or something, but the QB position.. for this game.. has only 1 job. Don't turn the ball over. That's all. I think with our running game, we're capable of pounding it out for 4 quarters even if we're behind to get a win. Their passing game isn't invincible as it was last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gambling in the first three rounds just makes the building effort longer. So you have to weigh that into the equation. Ultimately, you want to get to a situation where those picks net you at least one starter/starting caliber player and two very good rotational players(at LEAST) almost every year. That can get us back on track. So if you are having to just take a raw gamble in those rounds, versus a guy that can help you win games....I don't think we are in a good spot to be able to afford to do that. Definitely not year after year.
    • I mean, someone has to start. If we are rolling out Brycd for 17 games in 2025, I suppose that means we will get to watch the rebuilding process all over again. You can try and get another veteran QB in free agency but they will also have a salary attached.  If you want to take a gamble on another young and bust QB, that's fine but that also likely leads to more rebuilding after the 2025 season. Those guys so rarely pan out. So what is left? Draft a QB? Sure, maybe. But this isn't an impressive QB draft on paper and they are going to be walking into a challenging situation. Dalton as starter in 2025 isn't waving the white flag, IMO. It's just acknowledging that we have to start attempting to build a franchise.  That said, I would never be giving out $20+ mil contracts for older QB's(Flacco, Dalton, etc). That ship has sailed. 
    • I guess bottom line is we need to give Canales a shot at His QB. However they find it.  Ideally we would sign an undervalued vet that Canales knows what he is getting, and start looking hard for one we can grab at good value and groom. And for me it is okay to burn a pick on a miss just don't cripple your future. Hitting on your other picks should allow for a long shot every so often. 
×
×
  • Create New...