Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This is why matt moore should be the starter


jakesthemistake

Recommended Posts

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d8059fa89/Matt-Moore-Highlight-WK-17-vs-Buccaneers-2007

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d805a0c4d/Matt-Moore-Highlight-WK-17-vs-Buccaneers-2007

i dont know about you but i haven't seen anything like that out of jake this year

Matts hungry man give him the team he has something to prove

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt should be the starter cause this team needs a change at qb.I think Matt will play well if fox has the balls to start him and bench jake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's not ready to start:rolleyes: He can't read the playbook, oh wait wasn't that the excuse for Colbert, and Jarrett at one time as well as Matt Moore now. Kinda a recurring EXCUSE huh? Anytime a player underacheives here it's automatically the player cant read a playbook, i think its the coaches don't know how to groom talent....

BTW, you dont make that throw to Rosario in the vid and not have some skill...beats ol pick 6 anyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you people realize that game Tampa sat half their starting lineup in that game? They had a playoff game the following week and didn't want to risk an injury. You do realize we had more rushing yards than passing yards in that game? You do realize he threw one pick, and it should have been one or two more cause he threw into double coverage a few times just like Jake? Child please!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gambling in the first three rounds just makes the building effort longer. So you have to weigh that into the equation. Ultimately, you want to get to a situation where those picks net you at least one starter/starting caliber player and two very good rotational players(at LEAST) almost every year. That can get us back on track. So if you are having to just take a raw gamble in those rounds, versus a guy that can help you win games....I don't think we are in a good spot to be able to afford to do that. Definitely not year after year.
    • I mean, someone has to start. If we are rolling out Brycd for 17 games in 2025, I suppose that means we will get to watch the rebuilding process all over again. You can try and get another veteran QB in free agency but they will also have a salary attached.  If you want to take a gamble on another young and bust QB, that's fine but that also likely leads to more rebuilding after the 2025 season. Those guys so rarely pan out. So what is left? Draft a QB? Sure, maybe. But this isn't an impressive QB draft on paper and they are going to be walking into a challenging situation. Dalton as starter in 2025 isn't waving the white flag, IMO. It's just acknowledging that we have to start attempting to build a franchise.  That said, I would never be giving out $20+ mil contracts for older QB's(Flacco, Dalton, etc). That ship has sailed. 
    • I guess bottom line is we need to give Canales a shot at His QB. However they find it.  Ideally we would sign an undervalued vet that Canales knows what he is getting, and start looking hard for one we can grab at good value and groom. And for me it is okay to burn a pick on a miss just don't cripple your future. Hitting on your other picks should allow for a long shot every so often. 
×
×
  • Create New...