Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2019 Carolina Panthers Schedule Wallpapers


dpm0409

Recommended Posts

I've posted these in past years and thought I'd go ahead and share the 2019 versions.  There are several of these type schedule wallpapers out there, but I've always liked these.  Appears they have cleaned up the mobile versions to allow for a weather widget up top and a single line of "home" buttons at the bottom without obstructing any of the schedule itself.

Credit goes to Pro Sports Backgrounds.

Mobile 1:

carolina-panthers-2019-mobile-city-eastern-schedule-wallpaper.thumb.png.820c7079117eabf9fcca43cd723bb486.png

Mobile 2:

carolina-panthers-2019-mobile-field-eastern-schedule-wallpaper.thumb.png.80aeeb14263e3fe9a4eea8e4472dd83e.png

Desktop 1:

carolina-panthers-2019-desktop-city-eastern-schedule-wallpaper.thumb.png.4f5379ea2a1cd92f4ab5898c31e41d44.png

Desktop 2:

carolina-panthers-2019-desktop-field-eastern-schedule-wallpaper.thumb.png.cf819f6b14b028d99c00559ff1f97430.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ncsfinest21 said:

Good stuff man. From one graphic designer to another.

Appreciate it man, but I can't take credit for the design, that's all PSB, but I browse around every year and keep coming back to the one's they put out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...