Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How come you never see our teams draft board after the draft is over?


Recommended Posts

I was watching the video by the Bills where they are all in the war room and their board is digitally behind them. I start thinking to myself we never see anything like this Panther related.. I have seen Cowboys post draft board but Never anything close to that here. Many hardcore draft nuts like myself would love to know what the teams train of thought was post draft.

Panthers said they had Grier as their number one qb the entire draft, bs prove it... you had a first round grade on Greg little? Show us. I and many others would just like to know how you felt about some of our favorite players Rashan Gary was he considered? Sweat? What about Alderly in the second round? Did you guys even consider a Safety? I don’t see the harm in showing the fans after it’s all said and done. What day you...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

As a fan, I'd love to know myself but what is to be gained from the team's perspective by having it publicly revealed?

I imagine it would do nothing but provide transparency between fans and the front office.. to prove they had a plan, also just sheer fan fair.. more chatter back and forth between your community can’t do anything but be good for the team right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

Its better to tell the guys you drafted "you were the guy we always wanted", "we had a first round grade on you", and build up their confidence then let them see "man, they didn't really want me.  I was just leftovers".

Everyone is left overs tho.. you think all the teams behind bosa wanted another pass rusher other than him? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, no. Imagine you’re considering 6 different girls to date. So you make a pros cons list to rank them. Your top two choices get taken before you can make your move. Then you start dating one and show them where they landed on the list...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, micnificent28 said:

Everyone is left overs tho.. you think all the teams behind bosa wanted another pass rusher other than him?

While I am sure within certain frames people know that.  But lets say Burns was taken before, and we picked Little (or any other OLine in the first round).

"Hey, we didn't REALLY want you at that point.  You were like Plan B if the 3-4 other guys we really wanted that we thought we could get were all gone"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

I imagine it would do nothing but provide transparency between fans and the front office.. to prove they had a plan, also just sheer fan fair.. more chatter back and forth between your community can’t do anything but be good for the team right?

It also gives the other teams a lot more insight into your internal thought processes when making that draft board. That may or may not matter depending on your philosophies regarding the draft, but given the amount of poker playing that leads up to the draft, it's pretty safe to say that teams try to keep as much of it as close to the vest as they possibly can.

I also don't think it's necessarily a good thing for your new rookies to see where they ranked on your wish list. Better to just tell them you were their guy, you had them rated much higher, yadda, yadda, yadda rather than have them see that you were their 11th choice at that position. Maybe that would light a fire under some, maybe it would make others think that you settled for them and aren't really vested in them.

I just don't see any consistently positive outcomes for having that internal draft board becoming public knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

I can see why you wouldn’t want other teams to see your board and analyze possible tendencies.  But hell, it’s not like we didn’t Telegraph the snot out of Burns, Little, and Grier anyway.  It’s like we had billboards up for the guys we wanted. 

 

Yep, I made a post about a month prior to the draft that I was a concerned that we were making our interest in Burns a little TOO obvious. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...