If you had to choose one......Shaq Thompson or James Bradberry?

[therealmjl]

17 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I agree Bradberry, but I feel like many are down on Shaq when he has been above average and could bring a huge contract after this year. He just turned 25 a few days ago, and when he has been allowed to play just linebacker  (not nickel) without TD he has played very well. This was from Rivera after Shaq had 13 tackles against the win against the Ravens this year:

Ok that’s great what about the 15 other games we played?

[ncsu12engr]

At the moment Bradberry is the answer, but I would like to see how Shaq does with a full year starting next to Luke before making that decision.

[mc52beast]

Would go with Bradberry here but guys need to remember that Shaq has probably been playing out of position. He was drafted to take the place of TD and it never happened. 

Watch what he does this year in a more comfortable role

[steven8989]

10 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Would go with Bradberry here but guys need to remember that Shaq has probably been playing out of position. He was drafted to take the place of TD and it never happened. 

Watch what he does this year in a more comfortable role

He did that for 4 games to start with last year and how did that work out?

[archer4364]

16 hours ago, steven8989 said:

Yeah like Funchess, training camp mvp. Never translates to the regular season.

Imagine going to a thread and pooping on everybody talking positively about Shaq. So much negativity from you lol. Hater.

[kungfoodude]

Bradberry by a wide margin. It would be a lot harder to replace Bradberry than to replace Shaq. It would be nice to keep them both but gun to my head, Bradberry 100 out of 100 times.

[DeAngelo Beason]

Neither is so good that it shouldn't be affordable to bring them both back, but if I had to pick, it's Bradberry by a mile.

[WarPanthers89]

6 hours ago, mjligon said:

Ok that’s great what about the 15 other games we played?

80 tackles and 3.5 sacks all while not starting other than the first 4 games, and playing a huge amount of time in a role that captain couldn’t hold down. He is so athletic we used him in the large buffalo role, but he was above average when getting the chance to start. That’s why they had to let TD go. 

[MechaZain]

Bradberry due to positional value but y'all continue to sleep hard on Shaq. He gets better every year as his role increases but it's like you expect him to be prime Luke/TD already.  

[kungfoodude]

Just now, MechaZain said:

Bradberry due to positional value but y'all continue to sleep hard on Shaq. He gets better every year as his role increases but it like many expect him to be prime Luke/TD already.  

Too many people seem overly butthurt about Shaq. Sure his cap value is high at the moment but he is a good player. I can't see why you see so many saying we should cut him. He's the second best LB on our team. The rest of our non-Luke LB corps is pretty average. 

[Turnip]

Our secondary could already use some help at CB/S so I'd take Bradberry. Would like to think Shaq would come back at a very cheap price since he hasn't been a world beater. His athleticism is there and I think he could be even more efficient in a 3-4 defense like the one we're transitioning to currently. Our first round pick should probably be a LB next draft. 

[RumHam]

shaq, unless bradberry pulls a norman. he's been average at best with occasional flashes no matter what you fanboys say

[steven8989]

4 hours ago, archer4364 said:

Imagine going to a thread and pooping on everybody talking positively about Shaq. So much negativity from you lol. Hater.

Yeah I'm a hater on a first rd pick that has never did anything even when given a chance when TD was out. No different than me not liking Butler he is garbage too.

[Chief Keek]

Burberry Bradberry