Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Grier vs Kansas


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

If you haven’t already made up your mind about Grier (and you have, we both know it, no reason to say otherwise) watch Florida vs Tennessee in 2015. Or West Virginia vs Tennessee in 2018. Or West Virginia vs Texas in 2018. Then explain how UDFAs Taylor Heinicke and Kyle Allen are still much better options

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Ncpantherfan71 said:

And this is why I don't post and I am close to not coming here anymore.   Too many stupid pissing matches going on.  You have to go threw pages of, usually 3 or 4 people acting like third graders to actually read meaningful conversations. 

Nobody knows how to talk to each other anymore. No one can make a point without being an asshole or adding some sass. Then the convo goes south from there because the usual response to that isn't going to be good. Every reply is typed in a way to make themselves superior rather than just stating a side and carrying the convo from there. It's a superiority complex that is not only a problem on this board, but society in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ncpantherfan71 said:

And this is why I don't post and I am close to not coming here anymore.   Too many stupid pissing matches going on.  You have to go threw pages of, usually 3 or 4 people acting like third graders to actually read meaningful conversations. 

Jeremy gonna just ban us all eventually

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ncpantherfan71 said:

And this is why I don't post and I am close to not coming here anymore.   Too many stupid pissing matches going on.  You have to go threw pages of, usually 3 or 4 people acting like third graders to actually read meaningful conversations. 

That and the fuging threads that have nothing to do with the Panthers or football in general. (Before I get called out on it I did post threads of the like, on purpose so maybe, just maybe, the mods would move them and others like it from this forum. Apparently it worked.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem with him, but I feel that when we were trading up in the 2nd, pick #100 was earmarked for him, so we overspent #77 and kept the more logical pick "just in case". In other words, had we traded #100 and taken him at #77, would he be such a great pick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...