Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sonic the Hedgehog movie


Matthias

Recommended Posts

Y'all seen the trailer for this mess?
 



What complete garbage!  As for Jim Carrey playing Robotnik,  I would allow it, but once again, this movie looks like garbage.  Why do they do this to the legacy of old time favorites?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhhh how exactly would they make a "good" looking movie about an anthropomorphic hedgehog unless it was completely animated?

I actually think it doesn't look half bad, and neither did my kids when they saw the trailer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bronn said:

Uhhh how exactly would they make a "good" looking movie about an anthropomorphic hedgehog unless it was completely animated?

I actually think it doesn't look half bad, and neither did my kids when they saw the trailer.


Of course they did the pokemon movie decently in terms of looks.  Sonic here just look like a short guy in a weird costume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

another example of why hollywood needs to start coming up with its own ideas and stop trying to adapt from other mediums of entertainment/get out of money grab mode

some stuff just doesn’t translate well to the silver screen. i played hours upon hours of sonic as a kid and i love the days before it became a fandom, when it was contained in a video game and didn’t have all this bullshit canon from comic books and cartoons and whatever the hell else

you frickin fricks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, frash.exe said:

another example of why hollywood needs to start coming up with its own ideas and stop trying to adapt from other mediums of entertainment/get out of money grab mode

some stuff just doesn’t translate well to the silver screen. i played hours upon hours of sonic as a kid and i love the days before it became a fandom, when it was contained in a video game and didn’t have all this bullshit canon from comic books and cartoons and whatever the hell else

you frickin fricks

image.png.d406b29b0265f3583d374d906cacb3a3.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...