Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan on Matt Moore


Guest

Recommended Posts

He's on WFNZ and they asked his opinion a) if Fox would change QBs (yes), and then B) who would he start...Dan said that he has heard Moore doesn't know the playbook worth a damn and that Feely would be the starter, if it was up to him. He went on to say that he could be wrong about Moore but these are the things he hears from players. FWIW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, the more I think about it, the more I realize that this must be atleast partially true. There is no way Fox trades for Feely if he has any confidence in Matt Moore. He must just not try at all during practice and just kinda goes through the motions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, the more I think about it, the more I realize that this must be atleast partially true. There is no way Fox trades for Feely if he has any confidence in Matt Moore. He must just not try at all during practice and just kinda goes through the motions.

We didnt trade for Feeley, he was a FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I often respond to people who think they know how to fix the Panthers with a statement to the effeect, "People who actually get paid to make these decisions think differently. Why would that be?" I usually get a "Because they're stubborn, stupid, have a small penis" type answer.

This really explains the Matt Moore/Jake Delhomme decision if it's true. I guess it's not just about people who are smarter, it's about people who are better informed as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I often respond to people who think they know how to fix the Panthers with a statement to the effeect, "People who actually get paid to make these decisions think differently. Why would that be?" I usually get a "Because they're stubborn, stupid, have a small penis" type answer.

This really explains the Matt Moore/Jake Delhomme decision if it's true. I guess it's not just about people who are smarter, it's about people who are better informed as well.

Alright, I'll take it a step further............

If this is "well informed people" in the organization, or around it....then WHY O WHY....have we not addressed the QB situation, and went for fricking Feeley, and Garcia is still out there? Why have we not addressed the QB situation at all then if that is the case?

If you are that well informed, then something stinks with not doing anything to change it.

Inquiry minds wanna know...and I'm one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gambling in the first three rounds just makes the building effort longer. So you have to weigh that into the equation. Ultimately, you want to get to a situation where those picks net you at least one starter/starting caliber player and two very good rotational players(at LEAST) almost every year. That can get us back on track. So if you are having to just take a raw gamble in those rounds, versus a guy that can help you win games....I don't think we are in a good spot to be able to afford to do that. Definitely not year after year.
    • I mean, someone has to start. If we are rolling out Brycd for 17 games in 2025, I suppose that means we will get to watch the rebuilding process all over again. You can try and get another veteran QB in free agency but they will also have a salary attached.  If you want to take a gamble on another young and bust QB, that's fine but that also likely leads to more rebuilding after the 2025 season. Those guys so rarely pan out. So what is left? Draft a QB? Sure, maybe. But this isn't an impressive QB draft on paper and they are going to be walking into a challenging situation. Dalton as starter in 2025 isn't waving the white flag, IMO. It's just acknowledging that we have to start attempting to build a franchise.  That said, I would never be giving out $20+ mil contracts for older QB's(Flacco, Dalton, etc). That ship has sailed. 
    • I guess bottom line is we need to give Canales a shot at His QB. However they find it.  Ideally we would sign an undervalued vet that Canales knows what he is getting, and start looking hard for one we can grab at good value and groom. And for me it is okay to burn a pick on a miss just don't cripple your future. Hitting on your other picks should allow for a long shot every so often. 
×
×
  • Create New...