Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A statistical look at how average draft picks work out


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Lumps said:

Just statistic for starting.

Doesn’t mean they should be starting or are doing well at it.

Not saying there isn’t any evidence here, just pointing it out.

Amini started...Norwell didn’t.

The difference is that you are taking a sample size of 2 versus the sample size of 210 in that article. The point being that "on average" the round that players are drafted has a significant correlation to their long term success by most metrics. Length of career, average games started, reaching Pro-Bowl/All-Pro status, etc. That isn't the first article pretty much doing a statistical analysis that comes up with similar results. 

There is nothing surprising about that. The general consensus about most players is going to be fairly accurate and that is going to be reflected in where they get drafted. Outliers will exist but "on average" this will be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yep. Not surprising at all.

Yea, you can make a cut off at 15 back to the last pick of round 3 and the odds of a rookie starter is like 20% roughly. From 15-64 and your looking at 30%. Probowl around 13% for 15-64. 

 

Basically anything after the top 5 in the first round and you have a chance of getting immediate impact about 50% of the time and getting great multi year starter/probowl player is in the 20% range. 

 

Really gives you an idea of how shockingly hard is to be a GM or scout in the NFL. Drafting is 100% a crapshoot the majority of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting: a couple years ago the stats were 75%, 50%, 25% respectively for the first three rounds. After 3rd round the numbers fell off a cliff. 

I’d love to know what has changed and perhaps there is deeper talent coming out now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, jtm said:

Interesting: a couple years ago the stats were 75%, 50%, 25% respectively for the first three rounds. After 3rd round the numbers fell off a cliff. 

I’d love to know what has changed and perhaps there is deeper talent coming out now. 

This is just one season, if you look at averages over the last 10 years or 5 years the numbers stabilize and return to norms. However the 75% is only for top 5, after that the first round is around 54% or so. 2nd round is around 30%, 3rd round is around 15% and it goes into the low teens after that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...