Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This is why we pass so much.


rodeo

Recommended Posts

the moment Jake threw his interception in the 1st quarter against Buffalo, i said in the chatroom that it will be a 40 pass game.

almost to a T, every game that we have an illogically high amount of passing, Jake has thrown an early interception. when you look at this phenomenon during each game this season, here's how it lays out.

buffalo - early pick, 44 attempts

tampa bay - no early pick, 17 attempts

washington - no early pick, 25 attempts

dallas - early pick, 33 attempts

atlanta - early pick, 41 attempts

philly - early pick, 17 attempts

the Eagles game is the only outlier.

if you're thinking that it's because we have to pass more once we're too far behind, you're thinking wrong. in most of these we start passing either 7 points behind (which is manageable and not cause for abandoning the run) or ahead (dallas, atlanta).

this is also the root of the Arizona loss in the playoffs. rather than recognize that the passing game isn't going well and focusing on the run (even when it's successful) Fox feels the need to go all out passing.

so why is this? my opinion is that it's because Fox has the overwhelming urge to prove to himself, Jake, the fans, and the media that "Jake's still our guy." this is more important to him than winning. when Jake is in question, Fox would rather lose the game passing than win the game running.

what other explanation could there be? last week our team almost set a franchise rushing record. this week they were playing the worst team against the run in the league. we had plenty of success running, Deangelo had 5.6 yards per carry. yet as soon as Jake threw his first pick, we abandoned the run and threw 40 more times.

watch for this for the rest of the season and see if i'm right.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's an unbelievably good stat. And, I think you're right, I do believe it may be because Fox is trying to prove that Jake is our man... But, Fox doesn't call the offensive plays. Jeff Davidson does.

i don't know exactly how Carolina does it, but a lot of the time the OC gives the coach 2 plays, a run and a pass, and the HC relays which one he wants to the QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggested a while back the reason we throw so much, especially when Jake stinks it up, and why we gave Jake the contract extension is cause for some reason Fox has this lovefest for Jake and he wants to prove the fans wrong and that Jake still has it. So yeah I agree with your assessment that Fox cares more about proving the fans wrong than winning. It's something that Fox should be fired for just based on this alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

very intriguing stat. i actually wondered aloud while watching last Sunday's game whether or not John Fox or Delhomme owe someone in Las Vegas a motherlode of money. There is just no reasoning behind the way the team plays during some games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your reasoning behind this stat is true Fox shouldn't be allowed to coach another game.

I would like to see how Davidson thinks without Fox's influence.

I think setting Jake would be the best thing for Jake. Let him clear his mind, get some rest and practice and if he's needed later in the year maybe then he can contribute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you need to get over yourselves if you think Fox is always trying to stick it to you. "I'll show those little creeps Delhomme is good." Really?? I know it is hard to believe with the likes of Delhomme and previously Foster on the field, but all Fox is trying to do is win football games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you need to get over yourselves if you think Fox is always trying to stick it to you. "I'll show those little creeps Delhomme is good." Really?? I know it is hard to believe with the likes of Delhomme and previously Foster on the field, but all Fox is trying to do is win football games.

I agree Fox wants to win games, but Helen Keller could see this poo isn't working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So yeah I agree with your assessment that Fox cares more about proving the fans wrong than winning. It's something that Fox should be fired for just based on this alone.

Where some of you guys came up with that kind of accustation? Yes, Fox is still keeping Jake as the starter, but that doesn't mean he care about proving fans wrong than winning. If he did, he wouldn't been here few years ago then. I can understand many are upset with him keeping Jake despite lot of mistakes recently, but that doesn't mean he doesn't care about winning. :crazy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gambling in the first three rounds just makes the building effort longer. So you have to weigh that into the equation. Ultimately, you want to get to a situation where those picks net you at least one starter/starting caliber player and two very good rotational players(at LEAST) almost every year. That can get us back on track. So if you are having to just take a raw gamble in those rounds, versus a guy that can help you win games....I don't think we are in a good spot to be able to afford to do that. Definitely not year after year.
    • I mean, someone has to start. If we are rolling out Brycd for 17 games in 2025, I suppose that means we will get to watch the rebuilding process all over again. You can try and get another veteran QB in free agency but they will also have a salary attached.  If you want to take a gamble on another young and bust QB, that's fine but that also likely leads to more rebuilding after the 2025 season. Those guys so rarely pan out. So what is left? Draft a QB? Sure, maybe. But this isn't an impressive QB draft on paper and they are going to be walking into a challenging situation. Dalton as starter in 2025 isn't waving the white flag, IMO. It's just acknowledging that we have to start attempting to build a franchise.  That said, I would never be giving out $20+ mil contracts for older QB's(Flacco, Dalton, etc). That ship has sailed. 
    • I guess bottom line is we need to give Canales a shot at His QB. However they find it.  Ideally we would sign an undervalued vet that Canales knows what he is getting, and start looking hard for one we can grab at good value and groom. And for me it is okay to burn a pick on a miss just don't cripple your future. Hitting on your other picks should allow for a long shot every so often. 
×
×
  • Create New...