Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This is why we pass so much.


rodeo

Recommended Posts

the moment Jake threw his interception in the 1st quarter against Buffalo, i said in the chatroom that it will be a 40 pass game.

almost to a T, every game that we have an illogically high amount of passing, Jake has thrown an early interception. when you look at this phenomenon during each game this season, here's how it lays out.

buffalo - early pick, 44 attempts

tampa bay - no early pick, 17 attempts

washington - no early pick, 25 attempts

dallas - early pick, 33 attempts

atlanta - early pick, 41 attempts

philly - early pick, 17 attempts

the Eagles game is the only outlier.

if you're thinking that it's because we have to pass more once we're too far behind, you're thinking wrong. in most of these we start passing either 7 points behind (which is manageable and not cause for abandoning the run) or ahead (dallas, atlanta).

this is also the root of the Arizona loss in the playoffs. rather than recognize that the passing game isn't going well and focusing on the run (even when it's successful) Fox feels the need to go all out passing.

so why is this? my opinion is that it's because Fox has the overwhelming urge to prove to himself, Jake, the fans, and the media that "Jake's still our guy." this is more important to him than winning. when Jake is in question, Fox would rather lose the game passing than win the game running.

what other explanation could there be? last week our team almost set a franchise rushing record. this week they were playing the worst team against the run in the league. we had plenty of success running, Deangelo had 5.6 yards per carry. yet as soon as Jake threw his first pick, we abandoned the run and threw 40 more times.

watch for this for the rest of the season and see if i'm right.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's an unbelievably good stat. And, I think you're right, I do believe it may be because Fox is trying to prove that Jake is our man... But, Fox doesn't call the offensive plays. Jeff Davidson does.

i don't know exactly how Carolina does it, but a lot of the time the OC gives the coach 2 plays, a run and a pass, and the HC relays which one he wants to the QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggested a while back the reason we throw so much, especially when Jake stinks it up, and why we gave Jake the contract extension is cause for some reason Fox has this lovefest for Jake and he wants to prove the fans wrong and that Jake still has it. So yeah I agree with your assessment that Fox cares more about proving the fans wrong than winning. It's something that Fox should be fired for just based on this alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

very intriguing stat. i actually wondered aloud while watching last Sunday's game whether or not John Fox or Delhomme owe someone in Las Vegas a motherlode of money. There is just no reasoning behind the way the team plays during some games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your reasoning behind this stat is true Fox shouldn't be allowed to coach another game.

I would like to see how Davidson thinks without Fox's influence.

I think setting Jake would be the best thing for Jake. Let him clear his mind, get some rest and practice and if he's needed later in the year maybe then he can contribute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you need to get over yourselves if you think Fox is always trying to stick it to you. "I'll show those little creeps Delhomme is good." Really?? I know it is hard to believe with the likes of Delhomme and previously Foster on the field, but all Fox is trying to do is win football games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you need to get over yourselves if you think Fox is always trying to stick it to you. "I'll show those little creeps Delhomme is good." Really?? I know it is hard to believe with the likes of Delhomme and previously Foster on the field, but all Fox is trying to do is win football games.

I agree Fox wants to win games, but Helen Keller could see this poo isn't working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So yeah I agree with your assessment that Fox cares more about proving the fans wrong than winning. It's something that Fox should be fired for just based on this alone.

Where some of you guys came up with that kind of accustation? Yes, Fox is still keeping Jake as the starter, but that doesn't mean he care about proving fans wrong than winning. If he did, he wouldn't been here few years ago then. I can understand many are upset with him keeping Jake despite lot of mistakes recently, but that doesn't mean he doesn't care about winning. :crazy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Retired jersey, etc. It can't be done on Cam's terms.  'Be patient" and quiet about it is my advice. 
    • I see your point 100% and I agree with Cam in principle--but from the business side of things, it is not a valid argument.  Was he doing it for loyalty to the city or money?  He signed a contract and both sides fulfilled that contract, just like a teacher or a lawyer/client. Recently, I hired a stud lawyer at $550 per hour to sue my employer for violations to the UNC system policy that "injured" my professional status and reputation.  If he failed, he would have kept nearly $30,000. We won a big settlement.  Do I owe him more?  Should he be on our Christmas card list?  What if he went public and said, "I gave my all for MHS yet I am not invited to his house for Thanksgiving."  I did give him a positive review and sent his staff a gift card to a restaurant, but that was purely my idea.  Cam was paid about $110m for his time here. He signed a contract, he probably outplayed it and he sacrificed his body to keep Ron Rivera employed.  Not under debate.  But Cam's comment suggests that the franchise owes him more for doing his job well--at least in terms of honor and recognition--I agree, but it it can't come from Cam--and they owe him nothing. They should do it, and they will, but not on Cam's terms.  I also think it would be different if we had won a Super Bowl.  Frankly, Cam never had 2 winning seasons in a row--so I can see both sides.  Maybe only Dan Marino gets a statue without bringing Miami a ring; can you think of another?  Fran Tarkenton?  Warren Moon?  The Titans retired his jersey, and maybe the Panthers should do that for Cam--While I agree with Cam, I just think it should not come from Cam or people in his position. He played, got paid, and the rest is political, emotional, and cordial.  It seems petty coming from Cam.  So yeah, I feel you, but I don't think that statement helps him.  Just my perspective.  
×
×
  • Create New...