Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Name your front seven for 3-4, 4-3.


thunderraiden

Recommended Posts

3-4:

REDGE: Burns | MILB1: Luke | MILB2: Thompson LEDGE: Irvin 

            RDE: Short | NT: Poe | LDE: Love/Addison/Butler?

4-3:

SOLB: Burns | MLB: Luke | WOLB: Thompson

RDE: Addison | UT: Short | NT: Poe | LDE: Irvin

 

 

I would throw in nickle but there would be like 4 different line-ups we could field for nickle in big nickle, 3-4 nickle, 4-3 nickle, and even 2 - 4 nickel which is one of Rivera's favorites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

3-4:

REDGE: Burns | MILB1: Luke | MILB2: Thompson LEDGE: Irvin 

            RDE: Short | NT: Poe | LDE: Love/Addison?

4-3:

RDE: Addison | UT: Short | NT: Poe | LDE: Irvin

SOLB: Burns | MLB: Luke | WOLB: Thompson

 

I would throw in nickle but there would be like 4 different line-ups we could field for nickle in big nickle, 3-4 nickle, 4-3 nickle, and even 2 - 4 nickel which is one of Rivera's favorites.

We are short on 3-4 DL, but I think we could get by. We have 3 starters and 1 or 2 backups for that scheme. I would look for us to pick up some though in FA. Our 3-4 DEs need to be like 4-3 DTs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In our base defense I don't think Burns will start. I'd say Irvin and Mario will the the OLBs in the base 3-4.

Burns will be in for pass rushing downs unless he shows he can play the run. Same goes for Miller.

We still will probably look to sign a vet 3-4 DE but right now I'd say Poe and Butler are the NTs, Love and Short DEs. There are like 4 other DTs on the roster currently who will fight to fill in depth / PS.

Cox will probably be tried at DE and the other guys who played 4-3 end last year will get their shot at OLB. Guys like Haynes and Obada probably have a better shot succeeding as 3-4 OLBs anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

The concept Rivera has in mind is for these players to play either without having to substitute. 

I know he says that, but there's just no way around subbing 1 or 2 guys. I know Addison would have to come out for Butler in the 3-4 at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

I know he says that, but there's just no way around subbing 1 or 2 guys. I know Addison would have to come out for Butler in the 3-4 at least.

1. If the offense doesn't substitute than our defense would have to be quick to make that substitution  

2. If you substitute than the offense can determine our defensive set based on who the see coming in. Countering the whole hybrid defense.  

That's why our FA and draft defensively has been based on versatile players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

1. If the offense doesn't substitute than our defense would have to be quick to make that substitution  

2. If you substitute than the offense can determine our defensive set based on who the see coming in. Countering the whole hybrid defense.  

That's why our FA and draft defensively has been based on versatile players. 

Yeah.  Still don't see a way around subbing at least 1 player. Unless we're plugging Addison ahead of Irvin or Miller in 3-4 sets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3-4 set

Olb- Irvin, Miller, 

ILB - Kuechly, Thompson, Carter, smith

Olb - Addison, Burns, haynes

De - Love, cox Jr, 

NT - Poe, Butler

De - KK, Obada

If you have the starters on the field. The move to 4-3 looks like

De- Addison

NT - Poe

Dt - Love

De - Short

Move Irvin and Thompson to OLB, Kuechly stays in the middle.  

Been thinking, Obada is already 265 and 6-6, probably ask him and Cox Jr to add bulk to play end in the 3-4. 

 

 

That said I think it's a pure 3-4 move as the new base. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO the only interesting question is what the nickel looks like.  IF we only play in base 30% of the time and that gets split between the two fronts, we won’t see either of those very much.  

 

My guess is you take one of the 3-4 ends off and run a 2-4 as defaukt like 50% of the time.  3-3 maybe 12% and and maybe even some 2-3.  Like 8%.  

 

Id guess we see a pure 3-4% 20%  and 4-3 10%

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • More TDs last year in less games (double the TDs) and more yards per game. Those are some tough stats to brush aside. Career stats are good but we are wanting the player for what they are currently. DK had some drop issues too. 
    • I’m going with Nick Emmanwori as the pick right now. Charlie Campbell has him ranked 5th on his post combine big board and another safety is needed.
    • That is ridiculous on several levels. First of all you have to spend 90% of your cap space every year so the idea you can just not spend it every year is against the CBA. Secondly your job is to assemble the best team you can for the fans players and team. Not to save money for the owner.  Third many players who are considered great underperform while others like Luvu and Jackson have overperformed. What about a  great player like Derek Brown who was injured and missed all of last year. Was he a waste of money?? Sure pay DK a fools ransom and hope he stays healthy. He didn't even get 1000 yards last year which averages out to 60 yards a game or play all 16 games.  And lets be real, Jones and Watson aren't  great but they aren't being paid that much either. Real glad you aren't the GM.
×
×
  • Create New...