Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official general NFL Draft Day 3 open thread


ncfan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Will he be there?  That's a long way off and arguably the top DE prospect on the board.  With Irvin, Burns, Miller and last year's project Haynes, we are starting to build depth at OLB in the 3-4 scheme.

Doubt it

Would require a trade up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JakeDel5674 said:

Hurney 2.0 is better than Hurney 1.0. As a wise man said Hurney 2.0>Gettlemen>Hurney 1.0>Me>George Seifert. 

As much as Marty crushed FA considering our cap stranglehold, Hurney is being Hurney in this draft.  Versions I.0 or 2.0, Hurney always gives me a headache on draft days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

As much as Marty crushed FA considering our cap stranglehold, Hurney is being Hurney in this draft.  Versions I.0 or 2.0, Hurney always gives me a headache on draft days.

Ya know what though? He got edge rushers, and only gave up one Draft pick in the process. I'm not going to disparage him for that. He's done much, much, worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, is there even a safety available who we would expect to be any more than competition with Searcy and Gaulden? I doubt there is anyone who is clearly more talented at this point (which is saying a lot). I'd be fine with Thompson in the fifth but I don't think you trade up for him. At this point in the draft you're going bpa/highest ceiling, not filling roster holes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Agreed.

The team identified three needs: Tackle, Pass Rusher and Backup Quarterback. They're clearly comfortable with what we have anywhere else.

I have no clue how a defense mind like Ron can't see that our division rivals are exploiting the hell out of the fact that we don't have safeties who can cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We didn't take two guys undersized for our base 4-3 as a mistake.  This is clearly about the future.  Can Miller be a situational 5-tech or 3-tech?  Yes, but the key word is situational.  His home, as well as Burns, is going to be 3-4 OLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...