Does taking Little ruin our shot at drafting a starting FS this year?

[mc52beast]

Hurney gives up 47 and 77 to take Little, dude may or may not even start at LT this year. Everyone knows our situation at FS, pretty sure most of us thought our first pick in rd2 would be a safety. 

Does this move by Hurney mean we get no starting safety in this draft?

[Smithers]

The free agent market still had a few safeties available .

[ncfan]

Yes

[Peppers90 NC]

Most likely, yes. Very disappointing 

[tiger7_88]

Yep.

[Pantherzack179812]

4 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Hurney gives up 47 and 77 to take Little, dude may or may not even start at LT this year. Everyone knows our situation at FS, pretty sure most of us thought our first pick in rd2 would be a safety. 

Does this move by Hurney mean we get no starting safety in this draft?

Tre Boston still needs a job.

[Dex]

In defense of Hurney 1.5 there are more affordable F/A options at S than LT.

[RumHam]

Couldve had greedy

[frash.exe]

rip to anybody who thought we were going to get some serious secondary help in this draft

[bobcat91]

Frankly it ruins the rest of the draft. No more playmakers on either side of the ball. Maybe the 15 best OG or 20th best DT. We wont get a CB that we need, a FS that will cost us games or anything else. Edge rushers are gone. We totally wasted this draft.with these drafts we deserve to lose

[Toomers]

That’s just SEA rubbing salt in it. 

Could have Adderly or Thornhill as perfect compliments to Reid. And getting ready to pick again, Also takes legit DT/3-4 DE off the table and some good ones are falling. 

 

[TheCasillas]

Ill let you know in 2 hours

[Krovvy]

They could still trade back up. Currently a few safeties are slipping as the position is undervalued. If there's a particular safety they think fits what they're trying to do on defense next season I could see them trading up again.

[Shocker]

Metcalf like  WTF?