LMFAO.... Oh, Falcons, this is amazing.

[PantherOnTheProwl1523]

12 hours ago, Iron Saint said:

I already debunked the myth that Favre or Warner were ever targeted through their own words, if you're going to believe the League over the own players' words themselves then you're just a lost cause.

As for Rodgers and Newton, Rodgers was hit 5 times in Week 1. 3 of those 5 hits were on legal sacks. The remaining two hits weren't flagged. All 5 hits were by players that were not suspended: Casillas, McBride, Galette, Harper, and Ellis.

Newton was hit 3 times in Week 5 and 4 times in Week 17. 3 of those 7 hits in two games also were on legal sacks. Of those 7 total hits PFR counted, 6 were by by players that were not suspended: Jordan (2), Casillas, Ellis, Johnson, and Wilson.

Vilma was the only player suspended that got a hit on Newton or Rodgers and that hit came in the Week 5 game (14:11 left in the 2nd quarter and was not flagged), however this article clearly states the Week 17 game was when there was an alleged bounty on Newton. That brings up another question, in Week 17 what exactly would be the purpose of targeting the rookie QB of a 6-9 team that's long been out of contention of a playoff spot? Hell, even going into the Week 5 game y'all were only 1-3. Targeting Rodgers at least makes sense considering they were just coming off a Super Bowl win (and ended up securing the #1 seed in 2011), but targeting a QB that went 6-10? LOL, no.

Ah, Mike Ornstein! I was waiting for someone to bring up the 2-time-convicted felon. Real standup character guy he is, committing mail fraud in 1995 and then scalping Super Bowl tickets (that were obtained at face value) for profit from 1998-2006. He's a large part of the reason Super Bowl tickets are absurdly overpriced and even a pain in the *** to obtain so if you had trouble getting Super Bowl 50 tickets, be sure to shake his hand if you ever meet him.

Again, a "pay-for-injury" system never occurred. A "pay-for-performance" system, more than likely, not like you know the difference anyway; but a "pay-for-injury" system? No, and the injury data backs that up. Still waiting for you to provide any data you've found contradicting the injury data I've previously provided.

The only thing sad about it was a man was robbed of a year of his career and then the chicken**** League tried to have him fired by convincing two other owners to get Benson on board. But Benson told them to pound sand and now Payton will likely outlast Rivera like he has the other 7 NFC South coaches that were hired and fired since 2006.

And that premature ruling was rightfully overturned by Paul Tagliabue, exonerating all players of any wrongdoing and saying Goodell overstepped his power. THAT is your final ruling and matter of record, not the garbage Goodell flung at the wall and tried to make stick. When your former boss has to be called back into the office to fix your massive ****-up, it speaks volumes to the ineptitude that has been in the commissioner chair since 2006.

The fact that the League for decades denied the correlation between the football induced head trauma and CTE doesn't help the argument that the League is, or ever has been, even remotely trustworthy.

Also, why are y'all both copying from Wikipedia? Can't y'all form your own argument about this instead of e-vomiting someone else's opinion back?

 

 

There is a difference here between Sean "Trollface" Payton and Cam Newton. Cam isn't a manipulating dirtbag con artist HC like he is making plans to go out and telling his team  "If you do these things in a game I will pay you each a big paycheck if you win any way you can and by any means necessary". Cam goes out and tries to play without deliberate injuries put on him by other teams especially the AINTS. Sean "Trollface" Payton deserved the suspension he had gotten and it should have been a lot longer even being fired which was the better choice for a trash pile but the NFL felt sorry for him and allowed him to stay and continue to coach dirty in the land of swamps and cesspools.

Point is if Payton hadn't went out and planned and to pay his players to deliberately hurt specific key players on opposing teams he wouldn't have been implicated and suspended like he was. Many of Aints players were involved but made convincing stories to get away with what they were part of and did.

And btw, This was an NFL news story not Wiki as proof of this.

 

[Iron Saint]

On 5/18/2019 at 7:30 PM, steven8989 said:

C’mon now, if you’re not going to make your own memes then I’m not going to spend the time to make mine. 

This isn’t as fun as if we were making our own though. 

On 5/19/2019 at 5:15 AM, Sasquatch said:

The only place Saint come out of the bounty issue totally vindicated is in their own minds. 

From the quote you just posted, “He said they participated in a performance pool that rewarded key plays — including bone-jarring hits — that could merit fines.”

A “performance pool”, not an “injury pool”. That’s a far cry from the “pay-to-injure” scheme picture the League painted from the time the story dropped until that quote.

On 5/19/2019 at 6:45 AM, rbsponsel52 said:

There is a difference here between Sean "Trollface" Payton and Cam Newton. Cam isn't a manipulating dirtbag con artist HC like he is making plans to go out and telling his team  "If you do these things in a game I will pay you each a big paycheck if you win any way you can and by any means necessary". Cam goes out and tries to play without deliberate injuries put on him by other teams especially the AINTS. Sean "Trollface" Payton deserved the suspension he had gotten and it should have been a lot longer even being fired which was the better choice for a trash pile but the NFL felt sorry for him and allowed him to stay and continue to coach dirty in the land of swamps and cesspools.

Point is if Payton hadn't went out and planned and to pay his players to deliberately hurt specific key players on opposing teams he wouldn't have been implicated and suspended like he was. Many of Aints players were involved but made convincing stories to get away with what they were part of and did.

And btw, This was an NFL news story not Wiki as proof of this.

What part of “the injury data disproves any notion there was a ‘pay-to-injure’ scheme” don’t you understand? The fact that you still believe that fiction shows you didn’t follow the development of the story and only paid attention the first few days when the story broke and will hold onto that reporting as fact even when it was proven to be false.

And it absolutely is from Wikipedia, not only do all the hyperlinks in that section you quoted redirect to their specific Wikipedia pages, but the section you quoted is word-for-word from the “Bountygate” Wikipedia page, the 3rd paragraph under the “Findings revealed” heading.

You need a better argument if all you can do is quote Wikipedia and hurl insults. 

[ellis]

[Iron Saint]

Also, I figure y’all would get a kick out of this. I made this earlier off something the Falcons posted and instead of starting a new thread, I’ll drop it here.

 

[PantherOnTheProwl1523]

4 hours ago, Iron Saint said:

Also, I figure y’all would get a kick out of this. I made this earlier off something the Falcons posted and instead of starting a new thread, I’ll drop it here.

 

At least Falcons don't play dirty like Aints do.

 

[pepaw]

Anyone who watched the 09 NFC Championship game("Give me my money"), listened to the 2011 Greg Williams tape, or just watched the 09-11 Saints understands there was a pay to injure program.  To try to gray the waters and say it was for performance is disingenuous and a waste of everyone's time.

 

[pepaw]

I also just realized I quipped about "wasting everyone's time" on an internet Panthers forum in the off season.  ^

[bandu]

15 hours ago, Iron Saint said:

 hurl insults. 

Sean Payton in reference to bountygate...."hey it isn't the idea that this thing DIDN'T HAPPEN it's the idea that it continued for three years."..

then you have the nerve to come on this forum & say someone is hurling insults at you? when in FACT you are the one adding insult to injury...SMDH

[Sasquatch]

15 hours ago, Iron Saint said:

 

From the quote you just posted, “He said they participated in a performance pool that rewarded key plays — including bone-jarring hits — that could merit fines.”

A “performance pool”, not an “injury pool”. That’s a far cry from the “pay-to-injure” scheme picture the League painted from the time the story dropped until that quote.

 

So your only defense for the Saints actions is semantics? Gotcha. 

So, what would be the reason for fining any bone jarring hits?

[Black&BlueBubba]

On 5/3/2019 at 7:00 PM, GeorgiaBoyz said:

I’m bragging about curb stumping you “we loss better in our SBs” ass Dick riders . Clowns lmfaooo 

Ok.  Had enough from the Georgie public school educated fugging troll.  This sorry MFer comes spouting over here like he has a quality organization.  

Math lesson for the Georgia ignorant ***.  You are 94 flipping games under 500.  Since you won’t be able to figure that out, it would take 5.875 seasons of perfect winning ball to even get to .500.  Lets just say you guys can actually keep it together and go 10-6 for future seasons.  It’s gonna take you 23.5 seasons to get back to .500.  LMAO.  The statistically probability of that is 0.0%  Let me spell this out so you can understand.  Regardless your age, they will probably plant your dumb ass in the ground long before your doormat fugging organization ever gets back to .500   That is the definition of a sorry ass franchise. 

The panthers have been competitive since day one.  Are we perfect, no.  But you sitting there cherry picking a small segment of your overall NFL sorry ass doormat existence is ridiculous.  

Now take your drooling toothless Georgia public school ass back to your own sorry forum.   

[GoPanthers123]

If you are not a fan of Carolina Panthers you don’t belong here.  

[45catfan]

The Falcon's troll only has the head-to-head versus us to chirp about.  Everything else in their sad, pathetic, history is garbage.  He keeps harping on the head-to head because that's all he can hang his hat on, so let's do a League-wide comparison, shall we?  The Panthers have winning head-to-head records versus 14 teams in the League.  Only 14...sounds pretty bad, right? Oh, but the crows have winning head-to-head records against only 7 teams.  So yes, beat your chest that the Panthers are one of a mere 7 teams that hasn't completely owned your franchise its miserable 50+year existence. It's literally ALL...YOU...GOT, bruh.

[RoaringRiot]

They’re not very smart down there

 

[The Huddler]

i remember my first special needs evaluation..