Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For those on the DT Train at 16...


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

And playing hybrids makes the need for versatile DT/DEs a necessity. 

What is our 3 man front right now? Who is our SDE in 4-3? How many if any of our current players at DT/DE will be here next year? 

  Don’t know if they will, but there are numerous reasons for a player like Wilkins who can fill multiple holes. 

KK / Poe / Love / Butler

But you have to realize NFL trends as well when you think 4-3 vs 3-4 -- now more than any other time teams are running 'Nickel' defense upwards of 60% of the time and more to handle the expanded use of ''11'' personnel by NFL offenses, meaning whether you run a 3-4 or 4-3 you're gonna feature smaller lineups with a blend of run stopping potential as well as pass rush. 

This means quality edge personnel is still at a ''premium'' having a guy like Wilkins, or Lawrence is great BUT they're not playing over Poe or KK this year, the biggest gap is the edge of the defense. While some of you are uncomfortable with -- KK / Poe / Love + depth

We're in even worse shape - Addison / Irvin / ????

Edge is the one place aside from LG where a rookie could come in Day 1 and be a starter. KK / Poe are going to be demoted - the team's investment in them is too much. 

So while having a versatile big guy is a (+) you need edge players 1) for the 3-4 looks, and 2) as the primary edge rushers on passing downs. I think we will need to look to coaching to maximize the current interior DL potential. Play calling defensively can make a huge impact for two guys we've seen to be dominate at the NFL level (Poe / KK). 

And even though KK had a down year, he still was one of the higher rated interior DL in the league (2018) -- it's not all about sacks, he's not Donald or Cox but he's catching a lot of heat here in my opinion. (You can't argue the names on that list even if you are a casual) 

And he still wrapped the season with a quality grade as well. 

Image result for kawann short pff

 

Image result for kawann short pff

Image result for kawann short pff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Little Goody Two Shoes said:

Don't we typically meet with guys we have ?'s on and not guys we are certain about? 

Most teams meet for that as well as with prospects they really like, looking at 2018 -- our first two picks were from the ''PRI'' list. Again I'm just working off of Hurney 2.0 if time allows we'll have a bigger sample. 

Conventional wisdom leads me to believe our early picks will follow a similar pattern, I could always be way off, but I'm basing my thoughts on the available, relevant, and recent info. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again in a year where the ''ENTIRE DEFENSE'' regressed a bit under Washington & poor position coaches (Washington demoted, and the DL, and secondary coaches were replaced), even Poe provided quality play inside:

Image result for dontari poe panthers pff

Just too much information out there that says to me -- Edge is the favorite, while OL, and then potentially interior DL are the options early. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

KK / Poe / Love / Butler

But you have to realize NFL trends as well when you think 4-3 vs 3-4 -- now more than any other time teams are running 'Nickel' defense upwards of 60% of the time and more to handle the expanded use of ''11'' personnel by NFL offenses, meaning whether you run a 3-4 or 4-3 you're gonna feature smaller lineups with a blend of run stopping potential as well as pass rush. 

This means quality edge personnel is still at a ''premium'' having a guy like Wilkins, or Lawrence is great BUT they're not playing over Poe or KK this year, the biggest gap is the edge of the defense. While some of you are uncomfortable with -- KK / Poe / Love + depth

We're in even worse shape - Addison / Irvin / ????

Edge is the one place aside from LG where a rookie could come in Day 1 and be a starter. KK / Poe are going to be demoted - the team's investment in them is too much. 

So while having a versatile big guy is a (+) you need edge players 1) for the 3-4 looks, and 2) as the primary edge rushers on passing downs. I think we will need to look to coaching to maximize the current interior DL potential. Play calling defensively can make a huge impact for two guys we've seen to be dominate at the NFL level (Poe / KK). 

And even though KK had a down year, he still was one of the higher rated interior DL in the league (2018) -- it's not all about sacks, he's not Donald or Cox but he's catching a lot of heat here in my opinion. (You can't argue the names on that list even if you are a casual) 

And he still wrapped the season with a quality grade as well. 

Image result for kawann short pff

 

Image result for kawann short pff

Image result for kawann short pff

  What does playing nickel have to do with the down 3 or 4 last lineman? And at least get the facts right. It much closer to 75%. None of that answers who would be our SDE in 4 man sets? It sure isn’t Butler, Poe, Love, Irvin or Addison. Wilkins gets snaps there and at DT and NT in 4 man. Plus be good at all 3 spots in 3-man fronts. He would get close to 70% of snaps. About as much as KK plays.  

   And the whole unit was subpar. Even with KK playing decent. What does that say about the rest of them. And I’m sure Poe is going dominate for the first time in years from “coaching”. And Butler will be good for the first time....Ever. And Love will get younger. If you want to count Love and Butler then count Obada and Cox at DE. Same level of players. 

  You can save the “informative view” for someone else. I’m well aware of any trends, and much more aware of how much something is used than you. When you google for your thoughts, try to not use outdated material. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  What does playing nickel have to do with the down 3 or 4 last lineman? And at least get the facts right. It much closer to 75%. None of that answers who would be our SDE in 4 man sets? It sure isn’t Butler, Poe, Love, Irvin or Addison. Wilkins gets snaps there and at DT and NT in 4 man. Plus be good at all 3 spots in 3-man fronts. He would get close to 70% of snaps. About as much as KK plays.  

   And the whole unit was subpar. Even with KK playing decent. What does that say about the rest of them. And I’m sure Poe is going dominate for the first time in years from “coaching”. And Butler will be good for the first time....Ever. And Love will get younger. If you want to count Love and Butler then count Obada and Cox at DE. Same level of players. 

  You can save the “informative view” for someone else. I’m well aware of any trends, and much more aware of how much something is used than you. When you google for your thoughts, try to not use outdated material. 

Agreed, great post

 

And the whole point of a 3-4 is the OLB or hybrid fronts where an extra Safety comes down to OLB is for more flexibility run vs Pass protection. It’s easier to disguise coverage with a 3-4.

right now if we run a 3-4 look, it would be ugly. We have 2  zero technique or a zero and 1 and one 3 technique really and so if we have Butler, a 1 technique in a 3 technique, he’s not going to do what it’s designed to do— that’s my extent right there, played nickel CB and SS mostly myself— but that’s the way I understand it.

we really need to have another 3 technique tackle, preferably one with a serious attitude so Poe and Short get attitudes and blow things up.(our defensive line has no leader— bad juju)

we don’t have that at all right now. We would run a 3-4 look that’s UGLY... unless someone wants to do some Mangini dirty tricks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...