Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most Underated Prospects


Shocker

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Prime said:

With this draft being so good, there's lots that are underrated. Greedy is a top notch corner, he should be getting more hype. In any other draft ed Oliver and montez sweat both go top 5. Jachai polite looked like a top 10 pick on tape and he's falling on boards. Deandre baker is solid. TJ hockenson isn't getting the hype he deserves. Devin white could be even better then roquan. Plus, jaylon Ferguson and the entire Clemson squad. Really hard to pick which one is truly the hidden gem. 

This guy had a lot of praise from the guys on NFL radio yesterday and were talking about why is he underrated. They really like the kid to and what he could possibly bring to the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TBH in this day and age it's hard to find true under the radar guys because someone somewhere has watched their tape and said hey this dude might be pretty good. 

That being said. Greg Dortch WR from Wake Forest is a guy I'm keeping my eye on. He's short but can play the slot and return. The thing I like most about him is that he has an ability to get open which is king in the nfl. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SOJA said:

TBH in this day and age it's hard to find true under the radar guys because someone somewhere has watched their tape and said hey this dude might be pretty good. 

That being said. Greg Dortch WR from Wake Forest is a guy I'm keeping my eye on. He's short but can play the slot and return. The thing I like most about him is that he has an ability to get open which is king in the nfl. 

Nice--me too.  I think the draft is loaded at WR --best value late.

David Sills

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...