Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jawaan Taylor - Visiting Today*


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Pantha-kun said:

Wouldn't be surprised if all the DEs fly off the board before 16 and we end up getting the best available OT. 

Maybe, maybe not.

Think there is just a good of odds that OTs run off the board. 

Some teams with major needs at edge rusher such as Greenbay and Detroit grabbed their guys in FA.

Burns, while ranked up their.  Some teams value him higher than others.  He isnt a great fit for a 4-3 and those teams may not look at him in the top 15 pushing him down our way.

 

 

Rumors also going around that the Bills really may go OT if Oliver is off the board and they had their whole front office out at Dillards pro day

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt that happens, if you look at 1-15 there will be a guy or two that falls, considering 

Top DL - (Bosa, Allen, Q. Williams, E. Oliver, Sweat, Burns, Gary, Ferrell)

Top T - (Taylor, J. Williams, Dillard)

Top QB - (Murray, Haskins. Lock)

That alone is 14 players, and you'd have to imagine other positions are in that mix  for the top 15 as well like, 

WR - (Metcalf, AJ Brown)

LB - (White, Bush)

DB - (Greedy Williams)

*This doesn't even include the some what ''expected'' trade up for a QB once the top two go. 

We're in a pretty solid spot to draft a very good player, I don't think (Sweat & Burns are gone before 16), I also don't think if they're gone the top Tackle prospects won't still be there if that happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, black-panthers said:

We need to bring in Hollywood and metcalf 

Why?? So we can waste a 1st round pick on a depth player.. I swear I can't understand why every year the "We need a Wr or TE" group.. Feels we need a WR or TE.. We could have the most offensive weapons we have ever had Potentially and still ppl see a need?? Smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

would not be hating this at all. best available OL or pass rushers in the first couple rounds, please. First three rounds need to be pass rushers and OL and a safety thrown somewhere in the mix, but the main focus should be protecting the passer and getting to the passer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, black-panthers said:

Our receivers are not great and theyre all small. You guys are hilarious man. 

 

33 minutes ago, black-panthers said:

We need to bring in Hollywood and metcalf 

Says our year 1 and 2 WRs are too small

 

 

 

Wants to draft a Smaller rookie WR in Brown

 

Trolls gonna Troll

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, black-panthers said:

Our receivers are not great and theyre all small. You guys are hilarious man. 

There is really no way to even know how good DJ and Curtis are just yet.....and tall doesn't automatically equal production or even mean anything.  Our "twin towers" experiment didn't pan out too well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SetfreexX said:

Doubt that happens, if you look at 1-15 there will be a guy or two that falls, considering 

Top DL - (Bosa, Allen, Q. Williams, E. Oliver, Sweat, Burns, Gary, Ferrell)

Top T - (Taylor, J. Williams, Dillard)

Top QB - (Murray, Haskins. Lock)

That alone is 14 players, and you'd have to imagine other positions are in that mix  for the top 15 as well like, 

WR - (Metcalf, AJ Brown)

LB - (White, Bush)

DB - (Greedy Williams)

*This doesn't even include the some what ''expected'' trade up for a QB once the top two go. 

We're in a pretty solid spot to draft a very good player, I don't think (Sweat & Burns are gone before 16), I also don't think if they're gone the top Tackle prospects won't still be there if that happens. 

Also there should be at least 1 TE going before our pick and maybe 2.  But somehow all of the players you mentioned and both TE's will be gone before we pick.  Start crying now everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's a very good player, I like him a lot. Not as much as the top edge rushers though since he's a RT, but he's really good value and wouldn't hate the pick if he fell to us. A complete animal and a mauling road grader that we could plug in at guard day and eventually take over RT in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stbugs said:

I’m not opposed to either anymore although I’m not a fan of Dillard. I don’t like the thought of taking someone at 16 who looked like poo at the Senior Bowl. There were so many OL who outplayed him. Hopefully, it’s a smokescreen and the Bills take him dropping a DL down. I just feel like the value in OL is day 2 so please let Sweat or Burns be there or even Wilkins/Gary/Oliver (pretty sure he’s gone earliest).

I haven't done a ton of research on Dillard but he dominated that Oregon game. He must have really bombed at the Senior Bowl. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taylor was my Number 16 pick months ago when everyone here was bashing, and I took a lot of poo for it.

hes now rarely getting out of the top 10, very small chance he gets to 16.

hes still my favorite for 16 if he’s there. Sweat, Jonah, Ferrell, Burns, are my next ones not counting a wild card like Ed Oliver making it there or something. Yes I like Ferrell better than Burns. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...