Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reading tea leaves mock


ncfan

Recommended Posts

Nice write up.  Just a couple thoughts. 

I really hate the idea of trading up. We are not one player away and have holes everywhere including depth.  While I’m not a fan of Dillard over Sweat or Burns I would rather have Dillard and keep the 3rd in this deep draft pick. I also would not be surprised to trade down and get Murphy late first.   He is by far the best zone corner in the draft and would be a true #1  

2nd rd.  If we go OL/DL in the first I think we will look at the highest ranked players either st S or CB.  The CB’s you mentioned I do think will be there in the 3rd   Of the CB’s we visited I think only Joejuan Williams and Jamel dean will be there in the 3rd.  My pick in the second would be either Lonnie Johnson or Savage  

in the 3rd I like one of the tackles though again I think Tytus Howard May be gone. That dude has visited 24 damn teams. Someone will jump on him in the 2nd. Also think McGary is gone before third.   I like Bobby Evans in the 3rd or Scharping. in the 4th  

i get the feeling they will try to get a QB depending on round and value.  

Hopefully I am wrong and some of the guys I think will be gone are still available. But for the god sake please don’t trade up

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In prior years, it seemed like we only took a player we met with in the first... I recall a lot of folks that we met with might come thru when they were an FA (Ie: Dorian Johnson).

Might have been a GM thing. I haven't gone back to see Hurney's history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Icege said:

In prior years, it seemed like we only took a player we met with in the first... I recall a lot of folks that we met with might come thru when they were an FA (Ie: Dorian Johnson).

Might have been a GM thing. I haven't gone back to see Hurney's history.

With Gettleman I think we always met with our 1st rounders at least. I don't think that was always the case with Hurney

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moo Daeng said:

Reading tea leaves is looking at random things and telling someone's fortune. Looking at indicators and evidence is making an educated guess.

Just saying

Where you attempting to actually add anything to the discussion or are you just trying to be "that guy"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6
6 hours ago, ncfan said:

 

2nd: FS- this is a Strong Safety class.  Also the way the leagues works (you use FA to help set up the draft), this Strong FA crop combined with this overall draft class is going to push them down.  1-2 Tops Safeties will go round 1, with a possibility of 1 more going before our pick.  I think Gardner Johnson will be the first one off the board like you see many of these writers put in their latest mocks. 

We have met we with Adderley, Thorhill, Savage, Rapp, and Abrahm.  All guys who have been mentioned boarderline 1st round guys.  

Adderley, Thornhill, or Savage will be the pick.  All 3 will not be gone by the time we go up for our 2nd pick

 

Prospects Arrow in down directionGrade Position Class
2562215.png&f=png&w=134&c=80
MISSISSIPPI STATE
6.04 S Senior
5.92 S Junior
5.90 S r-Junior
2562422.png&f=png&w=134&c=80
MARYLAND
5.86 S Senior
2562423.png&f=png&w=134&c=80
VIRGINIA
5.85 S Senior
2562330.png&f=png&w=134&c=80
WASHINGTON
5.84 S Junior
2562216.png&f=png&w=134&c=80
DELAWARE
5.82 S Senior
5.80 S Junior

https://www.nfl.com/draft/tracker/prospects/S?college=allColleges&page=1&status=ALL

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheSpecialJuan said:
Prospects Arrow in down directionGrade Position Class
2562215.png&f=png&w=134&c=80
MISSISSIPPI STATE
6.04 S Senior
5.92 S Junior
5.90 S r-Junior
2562422.png&f=png&w=134&c=80
MARYLAND
5.86 S Senior
2562423.png&f=png&w=134&c=80
VIRGINIA
5.85 S Senior
2562330.png&f=png&w=134&c=80
WASHINGTON
5.84 S Junior
2562216.png&f=png&w=134&c=80
DELAWARE
5.82 S Senior
5.80 S Junior

https://www.nfl.com/draft/tracker/prospects/S?college=allColleges&page=1&status=ALL

 

To your point: Per Lance Zierlein, check out these 8 safeties with pretty much the same grade. 

This is the reason Marty Hurney didn't sign a safety in free agency. He knows we're going to have our choice of guy in the 2nd/3rd round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Where you attempting to actually add anything to the discussion or are you just trying to be "that guy"?

I wondered what the term really meant since it gets used here every year. Seems it doesn't fit the situation at all. 

Y'all can get back to saying the same things over and over In every thread. Sorry to distract from saying the same names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

With Gettleman I think we always met with our 1st rounders at least. I don't think that was always the case with Hurney

 

Yea I remember the last few we seemed to meet with our 1st rounder, but then we would never pick any of the other visits (maybe a cpl of exceptions?). But Johnson and a few others would come thru as a camp body it seemed later down the line. 

Would be interesting to go back and see if we have the data points available from Hurney's previous tenure to see any patterns he might have in regards to player visits (including 2018)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...