Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chad Reuter's 4 round mock draft


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

You can see by this mock that if we don't take a EDGE player at 16 there may not be any other instant impact edge guys in the 2nd round. 

This is my biggest concern. Maybe polite but oh boy if he doesn’t have a million red flags. I’ve done a bunch of mocks myself and if I go OT in round 1 I find myself going S, DT, or OL again in round 2. I don’t like any projected rd2 edge guys. Burns is my target rn for his pass rushing but if we can’t get him I think CF will come in and be solid right away. His combine wasn’t even bad but others stole the show. He’s got great tape too. Just not “flashy.” One of those guys in r1 will set us up to grab a rd2 OT like Greg little or yodney cajuste. Savage’s stock is rising but he could still be a third round guy and if not him there are other solid FSs with 3rd round projections. DE in the first just sets everything else up so much better assuming we are factoring needs into bpa 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthers8969 said:

This is my biggest concern. Maybe polite but oh boy if he doesn’t have a million red flags. I’ve done a bunch of mocks myself and if I go OT in round 1 I find myself going S, DT, or OL again in round 2. I don’t like any projected rd2 edge guys. Burns is my target rn for his pass rushing but if we can’t get him I think CF will come in and be solid right away. His combine wasn’t even bad but others stole the show. He’s got great tape too. Just not “flashy.” One of those guys in r1 will set us up to grab a rd2 OT like Greg little or yodney cajuste. Savage’s stock is rising but he could still be a third round guy and if not him there are other solid FSs with 3rd round projections. DE in the first just sets everything else up so much better assuming we are factoring needs into bpa 

Thanks, week 17.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...