Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cameron Artis-Payne - Re-signed*

SetfreexX

By SetfreexX,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not sure whether we ruined his chances of having an actual NFL career or whether we've basically given him free paychecks for years when no one else would've had him. Not sure I've ever seen a player stick on a roster for so long while being inactive the majority of the time.

Going with door #2, Monty Hall...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Spanish Grand Master

Ricky Spanish

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not sure whether we ruined his chances of having an actual NFL career or whether we've basically given him free paychecks for years when no one else would've had him. Not sure I've ever seen a player stick on a roster for so long while being inactive the majority of the time.

Bro, you've already forgotten about Bersin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Bro, you've already forgotten about Bersin?

Bersin was a regular cut and re-sign, but at least when he was on the team he did see some meaningful action from time to time.

Artis-Payne has been on the roster for several full seasons and only rarely been active.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
Posted
R-1nnRC3_bigger.jpgVincent Richardson‏ @vrichardson444
FollowFollow @vrichardson444
More

Vincent Richardson Retweeted Carolina Panthers

I like Artis-Payne, I think he's an underrated player, but I don't think this is a great fit as he is neither similar enough to CMC to be a direct replacement or different enough to be a complimentary rotation piece. Depending on the money it does add depth, but RB isn't fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...