Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cameron Artis-Payne - Re-signed*


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

Just now, t96 said:

He must not think very highly of himself... why stay here when he’s never even gotten a chance to get #2 touches?

Considering that, there may not be many other opportunities out there available, as a former 5th round pick with minimal touches there just may not be that much interest, if memory serves he was also 24 or 25 years old his rookie year so at this point he is what he is. Outside of depth which is basically readily available on most teams for JAGs at the HB spot, this is probably the best place / only place he could make a final roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, t96 said:

He must not think very highly of himself... why stay here when he’s never even gotten a chance to get #2 touches?

No kidding. After seeing what happened with CJ, you’d think he’d be itching for a better opportunity. Maybe he didn’t get any other offers. Who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Carolina Panthers have re-signed unrestricted free agent running back Cameron Artis-Payne to a one-year contract, the team announced Thursday.

In his career, Artis-Payne has played in 32 games with three starts, recording 491 rushing yards and five touchdowns on 118 attempts.

Artis-Payne was selected by Carolina in the fifth round (174th overall) of the 2015 NFL Draft out of Auburn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure whether we ruined his chances of having an actual NFL career or whether we've basically given him free paychecks for years when no one else would've had him. Not sure I've ever seen a player stick on a roster for so long while being inactive the majority of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Sweet. Rivera's dog house will be occupied for another season. 

Nah. This time we're going to give him lots of carries.

l also predict this will be the year that Damiere Byrd has a breakout season, Josh Gordon stays clean and Michael Vick finally masters the West Coast Offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...