Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Early Depth Chart Check - How We Look on Paper


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

Offense

 

                  Moore       (Moton / GVR / Paradis / Turner / Williams)  Olsen     Wright     Samuel

Newton / McCaffrey

 

------------------------------------------------------------

Defense (3-4)

Bradberry     (Butler / Poe / Short)     Jackson 

Irvin / Kuechly /Thompson / Addison

Reid / Searcy

 

 

Key depth on the roster already: 

Offense - Smith / Thomas / Manhertz / Larsen 

Defense - Obada / Cox Jr / Gaulden / Elder / Carter Jr. 

Depth returning from IR: Cockrell / Seymour / Smith (ILB)

Depth Needs:

HB / OL / Edge / DT / S

Positions in this color I see as the obvious choices for early upgrades and/or depth**

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say gentlemen if I'm just looking at starters right now (barring health) I'd have to say we look to be in pretty good shape as we still are early in the off-season, and approaching the draft. 

I am very interested in seeing how some of the 3-4 looks might translate (which is why I posted that specific group to show the assumptive personnel based on the current roster). 

Whether we add DL then OL in the 1st or vice versa along with the current 2 3rd round selections we could see some starting positions upgraded, as well as some quality depth added if we get the picks right. 

Another month until the draft, I can't wait!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we really value Larsen's versatility as a backup because he can fill in any of the three interior OL spots but I also think you have to play your best five OL and I can't be convinced that GVR is better than Larsen. If we sign or draft an upgrade at LG, then keep Larsen in that versatile backup spot but of we don't then play him at LG and if an injury forces an OL reshuffle then it is what it is, but don't wait for an injury to force you to play a better player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

Offense

 

                  Moore       (Moton / GVR / Paradis / Turner / Williams)  Olsen     Wright     Samuel

Newton / McCaffrey

 

------------------------------------------------------------

Defense (3-4)

Bradberry     (Butler / Poe / Short)     Jackson 

Irvin / Kuechly /Thompson / Addison

Reid / Searcy

 

 

Key depth on the roster already: 

Offense - Smith / Thomas / Manhertz / Larsen 

Defense - Obada / Cox Jr / Gaulden / Elder / Carter Jr. 

Depth returning from IR: Cockrell / Seymour / Smith (ILB)

Depth Needs:

HB / OL / Edge / DT / S

Positions in this color I see as the obvious choices for early upgrades and/or depth**

 

Horrific 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

I have to say gentlemen if I'm just looking at starters right now (barring health) I'd have to say we look to be in pretty good shape as we still are early in the off-season, and approaching the draft. 

I am very interested in seeing how some of the 3-4 looks might translate (which is why I posted that specific group to show the assumptive personnel based on the current roster). 

Whether we add DL then OL in the 1st or vice versa along with the current 2 3rd round selections we could see some starting positions upgraded, as well as some quality depth added if we get the picks right. 

Another month until the draft, I can't wait!

What? This looks like one of the worst teams we have had on paper in a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I know we really value Larsen's versatility as a backup because he can fill in any of the three interior OL spots but I also think you have to play your best five OL and I can't be convinced that GVR is better than Larsen. If we sign or draft an upgrade at LG, then keep Larsen in that versatile backup spot but of we don't then play him at LG and if an injury forces an OL reshuffle then it is what it is, but don't wait for an injury to force you to play a better player.

Drafting a Guard if a good one is there in any round would be good choice. Even round one although it wouldn't be my first choice because Newton with time and weapons will win games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sub Zero said:

We are still going to play a 4/3 defense guys.. I don't understand why some of you think the 3/4 will be our base defense.. Shouldn't you have a 4/3 alignment shown??

Yeah we just need more guys that can play both so we can do our 3-4 formation more often. It's not going to be our main look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Snake said:

Drafting a Guard if a good one is there in any round would be good choice. Even round one although it wouldn't be my first choice because Newton with time and weapons will win games.

Just not a big fan of using 1st round picks on interior OL. Especially when we have huge needs at pass rusher and DL and this is quite possibly the best pass rusher and DL draft ever. Using a 1st rounder on an OG this year would feel like a huge waste of an opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...