What position in round 1 would make you furious?

[pdub0702]

On the Defensive Side of the Ball: Nothing. We have many holes, therefore, any pick is a potential upgrade off the bat. 

On the Offensive Side of the Ball: Running back. This year the value just isn't there. 

[MHS831]

My first thought was shortstop, but then I  focused harder--I  would go with RB or TE.

QB is the best answer.  It would mean Cam is now nothing  more than vegan cigar bar owner who is the baby daddy of a stripper's kids.  (Heck, even out of the NFL his life is  awesome--except  for the Vegan thing)

[Tepper's Chest Hair]

RB, TE, QB, probably even WR.  On one hand, I wouldn't be completely against a specific TE or WR, for example.  I just don't expect them to be there at 16.  And the next tier of players would be way too much of a reach.

Anything on defense I could live with.  We could just pick BPA and be fine really.  While FA went great (even if you hate the Smith 5m/y deal), and it shored up some holes any defensive BPA position would be great to the long term health of the team.

[micnificent28]

29 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

My first thought was shortstop, but then I  focused harder--I  would go with RB or TE.

QB is the best answer.  It would mean Cam is now nothing  more than vegan cigar bar owner who is the baby daddy of a stripper's kids.  (Heck, even out of the NFL his life is  awesome--except  for the Vegan thing)

Wow...thats a bit much to say....

[Moo Daeng]

P, PK, LS

Other than that it's not worth the energy to be upset 

[DaveThePanther2008]

1st rounder needs to be a starter.  My biggest concern is we reach for a player for need.

If you reach and he bombs out aka Butler is can affect you down the line.

As far as the question is concerned.  I wouldn't blow my top over any position outside QB and RB and logically Kickers

Positions I would be happy about is DE, OT and Safety and possible CB if it is Greedy

Meh about WR, TE, OG, C, LB

 

[Moo Daeng]

27 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

1st rounder needs to be a starter.  My biggest concern is we reach for a player for need.

If you reach and he bombs out aka Butler is can affect you down the line.

As far as the question is concerned.  I wouldn't blow my top over any position outside QB and RB and logically Kickers

Positions I would be happy about is DE, OT and Safety and possible CB if it is Greedy

Meh about WR, TE, OG, C, LB

 

There is a conundrum there. If they need to be a starter chances are it's a position of need.  And drafting best player might not mean they are better than who you have there. 

I dont think self imposed draft mantras are very helpful.

[DaveThePanther2008]

1 minute ago, Moo Daeng said:

There is a conundrum there. If they need to be a starter chances are it's a position of need.  And drafting best player might not mean they are better than who you have there. 

I dont think self imposed draft mantras are very helpful.

Like Butler?

[Moo Daeng]

Butler wasnt a need and didnt turn out to be the best. He was just a bad pick. If he had been a quality player and started after his first year then it would have been a good pick regardless of not being an immediate starter. 

If a guy is depth in year one before being a 10 year starter you have succeeded.

[Toomers]

Any OL. Especially the subpar LTs available. 

[top dawg]

Not a thing. If Hurney hasn't proven anything else over the years, it's that he knows how to pick a legitimate star in the first round.