Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schefter: Bruce Irvin to Panthers on 1-year deal


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Hence the Freeney comparison.

The percentage of plays where he produced pressure is good, but you have to pair that with the fact that he played fewer snaps than at any time in his career.

So yeah, situational rusher, like Freeney with the Falcons or Tim Harris back when he was with the 49ers and got paid per sack.

But, he was also in hell in Oakland for most of the season, where iirc, it was rumored they were trying to dump him even in the preseason as part of their rebuild.  And I think I remember there being an issue where the Raiders ended up punishing him for being insubordinate.

Just saying, I'm not gonna judge a decrease in activity or snaps off what happened in Oakland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it. Feels like a 2015 Jared Allen kind of acquisition.

Expectations aren't very high because he's on the back end of his career now but he will be a much needed boost to the DL in multiple ways.

If you're upset about this signing then go be miserable somewhere else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there were multiple teams making offers, there is NO CHANCE that he didn’t get decent guarantees at signing which would make cutting him doubtful and wasteful.  Additionally, I would expect there would be some kind of voidable years added on so this bonus could be used to reduce the first year cap hit.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

But, he was also in hell in Oakland for most of the season, where iirc, it was rumored they were trying to dump him even in the preseason as part of their rebuild.  And I think I remember there being an issue where the Raiders ended up punishing him for being insubordinate.

Just saying, I'm not gonna judge a decrease in activity or snaps off what happened in Oakland.

Possible. Like I said, I'm for it. I just wouldn't expect him to return to his old form.

People thinking we just signed the Bruce Irvin of 3 or 4 years ago might need to adjust their expectations a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheRed said:

I like it. Feels like a 2015 Jared Allen kind of acquisition.

Expectations aren't very high because he's on the back end of his career now but he will be a much needed boost to the DL in multiple ways.

If you're upset about this signing then go be miserable somewhere else.

Hell yes.  This is what I always think when people get upset about a signing like this.  1 year deal people....this is a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great signing. We needed to bolster our pass rushing ranks and this fits the bill perfectly. He may not start but he should provide us some flexibility in terms of the defensive looks and will instantly be an upgrade in our rotational pass rushers. 

Hurney 2.0 is really making some good moves on paper. Hope they all end up panning out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Possible. Like I said, I'm for it. I just wouldn't expect him to return to his old form.

People thinking we just signed the Bruce Irvin of 3 or 4 years ago might need to adjust their expectations a little.

Understandable.  Still exciting for us, imo...  Even a lesser version of Irvin is the best or second best edge rusher on our team last year.  It's a quality, relatively-cheap signing at a position of need...  so, I'm all for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're snapping up what we can afford at positions of need. That's all I ever asked for. Irvin only got a one year deal so that kind of proves he's on the downside of his career, but the guy can still rush the passer and play well enough to contribute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...