Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Clemson Fans what are your thoughts?


yasuhara2241

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Shoulda went with 1981, they've been top 20 in attendance since then. 76k plus fans every home game in 2009. 

I mean there was a time when “Clemsoning” was a thing. Bowden never took them over the hill. I say this as Clemson was my #2 team growing up before VT joined the ACC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Lemory said:

Clemson fans didnt exist until 2011, change my mind.

 

 

:Eyes_Emoji_42x42:

My neighbors were huge Clemson fans and were flying Clemson flags pre 81. I've known diehard Clemson fans my whole life.

Been putting up with it from friends since I moved to Charleston in 2001 and made a bunch of new friends.  

Not a fan myself but this is far from true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, yasuhara2241 said:

There are a ton of Clemson players in the draft but I would like to hear your thoughts on the following players. What are their strengths and weaknesses. What Round? 

Christian Wilkins

Clelin Ferrell

Dexter Lawrence

Trayvon Mullen

Austin Byrant 

Mark Fields

Christian Wilkins - 1st round. 

By far his biggest trait is his leadership and motor. Non-stop engine and will give his 100% every game. Excellent pass rushing ability for a DT. Love him.

 

Clelin Ferrell - 1st Round

Another great leader and person. A lot of people are a lot higher on him than me. Will be a solid player and contribute, but don’t imagine him being a top 10 player at his position in the NFL. He really benefited from players around him on the D-line. 

 

Dexter Lawrence - 1st Round

The most underrated prospect coming out of Clemson and this draft IMO. Dude is a monster in size and agility. CONSTANTLY double teamed and beating them on a regular bases. Clemson’s sack numbers are a lot in part because of this man. Honestly he’s my number 1 choice for our pick at 16. Would be a top 10 lock in almost any other year. 

 

Trayvon Mullen - Late 1st, Mid 2nd Round

The kid was lock down all 3 years at Clemson. Came in and started as a freshman and has kept the job every year. Hard to gauge him based on being behind the best D-line in the country. Has all the meausables you want in the NFL. Wouldn’t mind him in the 2nd. 

Mark Fields - 5th and beyond

Unbelievable talent. SUPER fast. His issue has been immaturity. Never fully bought into the culture and expectation Dabo has for his football players. Constantly suspended for being late, bad attitude, etc. Honestly, I wouldn’t want us to draft him at all. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Panthers8969 said:

So let me get this straight. CF is the only player on the Clemson dline that benefited from talent around him? I have a hard time believing that. 

Absolutely not. They all did, but from a guy that watched every single Clemson game the whole time they’ve been here, I believe he has the least amount of NFL talent and benefited more than the other two studs than they benefited from him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SazmoRanger said:

Absolutely not. They all did, but from a guy that watched every single Clemson game the whole time they’ve been here, I believe he has the least amount of NFL talent and benefited more than the other two studs than they benefited from him. 

What does that mean, “nfl talent?” And can you actually break that down? I see a lot of people saying he benefited.... hows that? Did he see a significant drop in double teams as opposed to other DEs? Was the qb flushed out of the pocket from your DTs into CF every sack? Was the opposite DE facing the better OT? 

 

Im not saying there’s nothing to this assertion that CF benefited, but it’s like some sort of social media trend now that just caught on, like a wildfire. And the same isn’t said for the rest of Clemson’s DL which is really funny to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Panthers8969 said:

What does that mean, “nfl talent?” And can you actually break that down? I see a lot of people saying he benefited.... hows that? Did he see a significant drop in double teams as opposed to other DEs? Was the qb flushed out of the pocket from your DTs into CF every sack? Was the opposite DE facing the better OT? 

 

Im not saying there’s nothing to this assertion that CF benefited, but it’s like some sort of social media trend now that just caught on, like a wildfire. And the same isn’t said for the rest of Clemson’s DL which is really funny to me. 

When I say NFL talent, I mean he was an absolute monster in college, but I don’t believe his collegiate numbers will translate to the NFL level. Will he be a solid starter? Absolutely. Will he be a Clowney, Watt, Miller, etc no, I don’t believe so.

As far as double teams, neither one of Clemson’s DE saw many double teams. Majority of double teams we’re put on our DTs, Lawrence and Wilkins, both in which we’re unbelievable. As far as being flushed out, YES, a ton. Our interior pressure was what other teams couldn’t adjust to. They’d have 3/4 lineman fighting off both Wilkins and Lawerance and the QB still got flushed out of the pocket. 

I cant speak to the social media trend, but I’ve felt this way before this year... CF is awesome, but he’s sliding down boards because he doesn’t have as high of a ceiling as Sweat, Gary, Bosa, etc. Don’t get me wrong, I bleed orange, but I wouldn’t be ecstatic if CF is the pick over a multitude of guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here comes Frankw and his pathetic little persecution complex to claim I have a personal vendetta against one of the worst performing coaches in the league if anything I should love Canales because he’s walking proof that through the lord all things AREN'T possible.  This kind of performance is exactly what you’d expect from someone who filled the building with misunderstood Bible quotes about iron forging iron and inspired speeches about how he apologized for his infidelity by buying his wife a book deal.  once more into the breech dear friends, just like when I paid a stripper for an above the pants hand job in Orlando. 
    • As dumb as it probably sounds, we should have won that game.  Defense was bad but Bryce should have been better.  Pass rush isn't a good enough excuse.
    • You and I both know there isn't a coach we could or can still hire that can "fix" Bryce Young. Even at mighty Alabama with one of the best modern coaches in college football history Mac Jones was still a better QB than Bryce Young. Mac Jones.... We already know how you feel about Canales on a personal level so in that regard you wanting him fired is not news. You don't have to disguise it behind this shroud of rabble about not fixing Bryce Young. To his credit he somehow had us competive against the Chiefs and the Eagles on the road with #9. But no coaching staff can overcome their starting QB turning the ball over 4 times. We definitely have developed some of our younger offensive pieces. And as far as Evero goes he has earned criticism and if he's fired so be it but in his defense many of us said in the offseason this defensive roster was a disaster waiting to happen given the resources we spent on the offense while neglecting the defense. That was Dan Morgan's plan. He swung too hard toward offense to salvage the Bryce Young trade. That's on him. We can scream about XL all we want but at least he's actually been on the field for the most part. The Brooks pick was a luxury pick at the time and now it is a Hurney level blunder. Dan Morgan has gotten a lot of early praise here when in reality he's unequivocally deserving of significant criticism. But if you say that some people get up in arms because he's a former Panther. Big whoop. He has just as much to prove this upcoming season as Canales. That's why to me in my own personal opinion I say one more season and then if it's more of the same say goodbye to both.
×
×
  • Create New...