Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam is Vegan now and other off season news.


Tbe

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

So I guess now not even eating fish. 

Cigsrs aren’t great for a person’s body either 

he is a grown man and can do what he wants. It’s just the oxymoron of Cam

 

eating crap quality meat is way worse than an occasional cigar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Peppers90 NC said:

Some of the fattest people i have seen are vegan, it wont matter if you are eating all that processed box/plastic wrapper BS being passed off as "food"

True. Most vegans I know go heavy on the carbs. I doubt Cam is doing that though. 

I think it’s great that he has a guy giving him shoulder treatment 2-3x a day. Brady has a similar person that treats him everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dex said:

Calories in vs Calories burned determines weight. It's that simple.

Yes, but a plant based diet is still the healthiest way to live. The science is irrefutable. Of course, vegan doesn’t mean plant based.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m dead serious. Please somebody close to Cam reconsider veganism long term. All you need to do is look on YouTube of ex vegans. It is not pretty. It’s a great reset diet. Historically it was used as a fast. But no civilization or tribe has ever been fully vegan. I’ve known two people who hurt themselves doing strict vegetarianism causing autoimmune and gut problems. I’m dead serious about this. Please somebody warn him or our franchise qb’s health will be in danger long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tbe said:

Yes, but a plant based diet is still the healthiest way to live. The science is irrefutable. Of course, vegan doesn’t mean plant based.

I wasn't arguing health. Just weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Plant-based” has been taken by vegans meaning no animal products whatsoever. But even the so called blue zones like Crete or Okinawans had animal products such as fish, pork and milk in their diet. Veganism is a modern experiment. No actual evidence we can replace all our nutrients on plants alone. Guys. This is not going to end well for our qb if he does this long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of not for the football forum...  but, can someone explain to me how you get you're daily caloric needs and protein off a vegan diet?  If I'm cutting, I usually go 1700 cals/day.  I could eat twenty 3 lbs. bags of spinach, and I would probably be at 300 calories total lol.  So, how do you get enough calories and protein...  especially if you dont add eggs or meat?  And it seems you just have to eat so much more bc the options arent calorie dense.

With the more stuff I've read, I'm thinking more about cutting out meat, but it just seems impossible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Random,  if the Giants do take Carter... and try to trade Kayvon...  I would think about it. If Sanders gets to 8 and they want to trade up from 3(I know that's far) by adding Kayvon and pick swaps in next couple rds and a future 1st or 2nd maybe... Id be game. They pick at the top of each rd, so we'd get talent spill over, a pass rusher with yout/ skill and still have that 34 pick to get a wr etc. 
    • Those guys you mentioned are ILB at the next level. They will be really good too. We could use any of them and like you I hope we can get one of them later on in the draft. The teams need on defense is great than the amount of picks they have. If they are sticking with the 3-4 base they will need another ILB and a OLB that can play DE in 4-3 packages. The front 7 is far from complete and the secondary will not get every need addressed this offseason. The talent is just not going to be available when we are picking I'm afraid. 
    • There are very few players in this draft that don't have a concern that could cause someone to not like them---I think the longer a player hangs around the top 10 (beginning in February) the more their flaws could withstand the scrutiny. Some fall too far, in my opinion, and are thrown into the scratch and dent bin.  Jack Sawyer (Ohio State) comes to mind, Shavon Revel (East Carolina), Restrepo (Miami).  I wonder if it is not that we found things through research, it could be that we exploited trivial things.  You can't measure the "it" factor. Those three just mentioned--I would have no problem drafting them at a discount.  Restrepo ran a 4.8--not as big a deal as people think--he is going to be a chain-moving slot--he will be sliding underneath, finding a hole in the zone, etc.  Great hands, great attitude.  I take him in the fourth.  Jack Sawyer is the high motor over-achiever.  I think he can be a 8-10 sack guy, block a lot of passes, and hold the edge.  I take him in round 3 if they let him fall that far.  Revel could be one of the top 3 CBs--if he is there at 58, I take him.  When the flaw is what you see when you hear their names, you are blind to their other talents.
×
×
  • Create New...