Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#Gettlemagic Back At It


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

Can't make this poo up -- Let's Collins walk, trades OBJ, and is now showing interest in the weakest link on the OL we've ever had...

I know many of us drank the kool-aid with the cap getting cleared up when he arrived, but after that the man IMO has just gotten worse, and worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shiii, Remmers was terrible, worse than Kalil, just made less, and was at RT. i know a lot of people give Kalil a hard time, but he actually graded out well as 2017 came to a close (final half of the season), in an 11-5 season. He wasn't elite, but he was solid down the stretch. I think he average like a mid 70's grade throughout the 2nd half of the year. 

Paradis the Ceneter most of us are happy about was around 80's if memory serves before injury. We could be doing worse at LT aside from the contract. However that is simply the market for avg, or even below avg LT's given college T's aren't coming in prepared for the pro game.

Feels like a lot of people forget that we were playing well, we just had NO RECEIVERS vs New Orleans. 

Image result for matt kalil pff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remmers is solid...  but Gettleman's angle is ego.  He gets rid of as many guys from previous management as he can, tears it down to the foundation, then brings in his own guys so he gets all of the credit if it goes right.

But, again, he far too often cuts off his own nose to spite his face.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have a once-in-a-lifetime running back, paired with a formidable run blocking line.

But they still have a horrible coach with Eli Manning hitting QB menopause. They don’t have any formidable skill weapons other than Barkley.

Defensively, they’re going to rely on blitzing, because that’s what their DC does. But they don’t have their dominant centerfielder back there anymore. 

But again, it’s Shurmur. I have no clue why he has that job. It’s like the last person I would look to hire, and he gets a second stab at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

Shiii, Remmers was terrible, worse than Kalil, just made less, and was at RT. i know a lot of people give Kalil a hard time, but he actually graded out well as 2017 came to a close (final half of the season), in an 11-5 season. He wasn't elite, but he was solid down the stretch. I think he average like a mid 70's grade throughout the 2nd half of the year. 

Paradis the Ceneter most of us are happy about was around 80's if memory serves before injury. We could be doing worse at LT aside from the contract. However that is simply the market for avg, or even below avg LT's given college T's aren't coming in prepared for the pro game.

Feels like a lot of people forget that we were playing well, we just had NO RECEIVERS vs New Orleans. 

Image result for matt kalil pff

Lol. That was one game

Remmers at whatever he is paid is a fugload better than Kalil at his salary.

It's not even close

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

hate when people say "can't make this poo up" It would be a solid signing. I would have been for him coming here on 

a cheap deal in a back up capacity. Better than amini and can play multiple positions. As long as he isn't a starting tackle then Im good

You can hate it, but we also when DG was here let Remmers go a season later, and now he's interested in bringing him to NYG. So yea given his SB performance, and sub par 2016 season I think it's funny the same GM that let him go is now interested in him again in New York. 

I felt the same when they added Shula to the staff, whether or not if he's calling plays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...