Shots Fired - #gettlemagic

[Toomers]

3 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Again the post of you bringing up hurney, than there’s a post before this of you being coy by saying why don’t we use the previous 3 years don’t both gms suck? 

 

How does that warrant anything close to me “bringing Hurney into irrelevant arguments. I had to describe between them because you brought up different GMs. Are you saying I said something wrong about him. How does Hurneys years mean something bad? So again your still swinging and missing. You went to your default mode before necessary. 

 

Trying to figure out how hurney finds his way into a discussion about dg releasing smith and the manor he did it.....you and bringing up hurney in irrelevant arguments is some kind of niche of yours.

[Toomers]

2 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Now explain to the people at home why hurney was relavant to this argument, because you brought him up 

boom goes the dynamite 

The dynamite is your reputation. That post shows nothing to your bias and statements. Again Sorry he cut your luvee.

[Cpt slay a ho]

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

 

How does that warrant anything close to me “bringing Hurney into irrelevant arguments. I had to describe between them because you brought up different GMs. Are you saying I said something wrong about him. How does Hurneys years mean something bad? So again your still swinging and missing. You went to your default mode before necessary. 

 

Trying to figure out how hurney finds his way into a discussion about dg releasing smith and the manor he did it.....you and bringing up hurney in irrelevant arguments is some kind of niche of yours.

Because for the 100th time what does any year prior to 2013 have to do with the team success without smith compared to with Smith. Dg released smith and thought the team was better without him, so we used the years he had smith on the roster and the years he didn’t, why are we going back 3 seasons before dg was hired to prove anything.....it’s not about dissing hurney it’s about he isn’t relavant to the argument that is being made so why bring him, John Fox, or clausen into this....

[Toomers]

Just now, Cpt slay a ho said:

Because for the 100th time what does any year prior to 2013 have to do with the team success without smith compared to with Smith. Dg released smith and thought the team was better without him, so we used the years he had smith on the roster and the years he didn’t, why are we going back 3 seasons before dg was hired to prove anything.....it’s not about dissing hurney it’s about he isn’t relavant to the argument that is being made so why bring him, John Fox, or clausen into this....

Your statement is absolutely and directly aimed at me “dissing Hurney”. Want to ask the board about your statement. It’s not hard to tell what you were insinuating. But you keep harping on a mention of those years automatically means a shot at Hurney. Smith was here those years, doesn’t matter who GM was. As I stated many times. How many times did I ask why you even brought GMs up. But YOU accuse me. 

  

[Toomers]

21 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Now explain to the people at home why hurney was relavant to this argument, because you brought him up 

boom goes the dynamite 

sole purposed of the argument was proving we’d not win nor lose a Super Bowl with smith on the team, you found it apon yourself to bring up 3 season prior to 2013 with smith , which have nothing to do with the team success AFTER Smith, which is the whole

point of the argument. Check mate 

 

I brought up Cam too. Was I taking a shot at him. What did I say that was in any way bad about Hurney? Mainly because you brought up GMs and forced a distinction for no reason. Who brought up GMs? How did I bring Hurney in if I never said anything a bout him. 

You keep claiming you posted the proof already but keep bringing new posts up seasrchimg for something that isn’t there. Which is it? Is this like earlier when you acted like Ken Lucas didn’t get his ass jumped until it was brought up specifically. 

[Cpt slay a ho]

6 hours ago, Toomers said:

Your statement is absolutely and directly aimed at me “dissing Hurney”. Want to ask the board about your statement. It’s not hard to tell what you were insinuating. But you keep harping on a mention of those years automatically means a shot at Hurney. Smith was here those years, doesn’t matter who GM was. As I stated many times. How many times did I ask why you even brought GMs up. But YOU accuse me. 

  

This also has been answered 100 times, you specifically asked why not use years prior to 2013 and I answered why, you took it as dissing hurney that’s not what I said, I said he found a way into this discussion when he was t relavant to the argument. Again you take it as a diss, get out ya feelings, ain’t a diss towards anyone , just a simple statement saying why bring irrelevant seasons into the equation. 

I did acknowledge ken getting punched I said it was over a decade ago, you’re again being lazy and not reading I’ve quoted multiple post of you asking why not use the 3 seasons prior to 2013, and you mentioning hurneys name 

[AceBoogie]

Gentleman is on his way to destroying yet another team and y’all are still defending him? Taking his side over 89? Y’all do know that 89 was the only thing that kept us from being the Browns for years. You know how hard that is to do for a WR? 

 

fug Gettleman. Worse thing to ever happen to this team. 

[Toomers]

1 hour ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

This also has been answered 100 times, you specifically asked why not use years prior to 2013 and I answered why, you took it as dissing hurney that’s not what I said, I said he found a way into this discussion when he was t relavant to the argument. Again you take it as a diss, get out ya feelings, ain’t a diss towards anyone , just a simple statement saying why bring irrelevant seasons into the equation. 

I did acknowledge ken getting punched I said it was over a decade ago, you’re again being lazy and not reading I’ve quoted multiple post of you asking why not use the 3 seasons prior to 2013, and you mentioning hurneys name 

I didn’t take anything as dissing Hurney? You tried that with your “it’s my niche” comment. Which you can’t find anything to justify stating. Or you would. Where did I mention GMs before you. Did I ask why you brought them up. I even threw your catchphrase of “Don’t they both suck” in there. So how am I throwing Hurney into it. Did I question QBs? That was a valid point. But how does a GM effect a player on the field. And I’m the one who brought Hurney in it? You couldn’t be more FOS. 

Keep swinging. But it’s easy to see you tried to go to your “anti-Hurney” card just like you’ve done every time we have ever had a discussion. When it’s clear only one of us has a “feeling” for anyone in this discussion.   

 And you repeatedly stated it was a decade from the decision. Which it never was. Correct? So it’s not like your tied to facts to make your point. Just like you keep dancing around the truth here. 

[Cpt slay a ho]

46 minutes ago, Toomers said:

I didn’t take anything as dissing Hurney? You tried that with your “it’s my niche” comment. Which you can’t find anything to justify stating. Or you would. Where did I mention GMs before you. Did I ask why you brought them up. I even threw your catchphrase of “Don’t they both suck” in there. So how am I throwing Hurney into it. Did I question QBs? That was a valid point. But how does a GM effect a player on the field. And I’m the one who brought Hurney in it? You couldn’t be more FOS. 

Keep swinging. But it’s easy to see you tried to go to your “anti-Hurney” card just like you’ve done every time we have ever had a discussion. When it’s clear only one of us has a “feeling” for anyone in this discussion.   

 And you repeatedly stated it was a decade from the decision. Which it never was. Correct? So it’s not like your tied to facts to make your point. Just like you keep dancing around the truth here. 

I stated it was a decade ago from now not retro act from smiths last season get it correct.

you still have yet to answer why are the 3 previous seasons 2013 relavant to why smith was released, if anything it smashes your original argument about smiths production, since those previous years were some of his more productive ones. Again you can’t understand the simple concept of dg was hired in 2013, anything prior to that isn’t his problem, so why are we bringing it up? How is it relavant to smith being released in 2014? 

Ive already told you time in again could care less about both gms, so don’t start that hurney dg bs get out ya feelings 

[Toomers]

11 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

I stated it was a decade ago from now not retro act from smiths last season get it correct.

you still have yet to answer why are the 3 previous seasons 2013 relavant to why smith was released, if anything it smashes your original argument about smiths production, since those previous years were some of his more productive ones. Again you can’t understand the simple concept of dg was hired in 2013, anything prior to that isn’t his problem, so why are we bringing it up? How is it relavant to smith being released in 2014? 

Ive already told you time in again could care less about both gms, so don’t start that hurney dg bs get out ya feelings 

I’ve answered several times that it’s part of evaluation of his declining skills. Why wouldn’t any GM not look at declining stats, and play, when determining what to do? That’s first-grade basic. And why I immediately asked what does the GM have to do with his play. But you’re fixated on this.to deflect from your accusations. How many times can I answer that? And you can’t find anything to justify your statement. Just more of the same rambling. 

  You brought them up. You accused me of it. You have lied repeatedly to deflect from it. Where did I say this magic stuff where I had a “niche” Explain that? You can’t. And won’t. Because it doesn’t exist. We know how you feel. 

 

And in in direct response to me stating 2008 is not a decade earlier than 2014, you still respond with the same lie. As shown below. See how easy that is. Now show me where I said anything to bring Hurney into this? 

Cpt slay a ho     1,960

•  
•  
•  

Posted Friday at 10:55 AM

   On 3/8/2019 at 10:19 AM,  Toomers said: 

Gettleman probably would have too. But Smith cost 10M and the others around 2M. We couldn’t afford him. We had 27M in dead cap. 12.5.in a tag on Hardy. 2 overpaid RBs we couldn’t cut. 

 You just want to hypothetically insert a perfect scenario for Smitty. When reality is a near perfect scenario DID happen. I don’t have to wonder. 

  June of 2008 was not a decade earlier than 2014. How many reports are there of SS blowing up at numerous people? That’s the other reason he got sent on. You can disregard it all you want, but it was definitely part of the process. So....make believe huh?

First off you started the hypothetical when stating we may not have made it to the super bowl with smith on the roster. Lol it was not 2m for the avants, Jerichos etc, how much dead money did we take on from releasing smith 

you’re back pedaling, it has been well over a deacade since smith has been involved in a physical altercation with a teammate, like you suggested he would against cam and than call me out for an hypothetical.....poetic 

[Cpt slay a ho]

2 hours ago, Toomers said:

I’ve answered several times that it’s part of evaluation of his declining skills. Why wouldn’t any GM not look at declining stats, and play, when determining what to do? That’s first-grade basic. And why I immediately asked what does the GM have to do with his play. But you’re fixated on this.to deflect from your accusations. How many times can I answer that? And you can’t find anything to justify your statement. Just more of the same rambling. 

  You brought them up. You accused me of it. You have lied repeatedly to deflect from it. Where did I say this magic stuff where I had a “niche” Explain that? You can’t. And won’t. Because it doesn’t exist. We know how you feel. 

 

And in in direct response to me stating 2008 is not a decade earlier than 2014, you still respond with the same lie. As shown below. See how easy that is. Now show me where I said anything to bring Hurney into this? 

Cpt slay a ho     1,960

•  
•  
•  

Posted Friday at 10:55 AM

   On 3/8/2019 at 10:19 AM,  Toomers said: 

Gettleman probably would have too. But Smith cost 10M and the others around 2M. We couldn’t afford him. We had 27M in dead cap. 12.5.in a tag on Hardy. 2 overpaid RBs we couldn’t cut. 

 You just want to hypothetically insert a perfect scenario for Smitty. When reality is a near perfect scenario DID happen. I don’t have to wonder. 

  June of 2008 was not a decade earlier than 2014. How many reports are there of SS blowing up at numerous people? That’s the other reason he got sent on. You can disregard it all you want, but it was definitely part of the process. So....make believe huh?

First off you started the hypothetical when stating we may not have made it to the super bowl with smith on the roster. Lol it was not 2m for the avants, Jerichos etc, how much dead money did we take on from releasing smith 

you’re back pedaling, it has been well over a deacade since smith has been involved in a physical altercation with a teammate, like you suggested he would against cam and than call me out for an hypothetical.....poetic 

Yesterday is March 9 2019, Smith last incident was in 2008, let’s do math class, that’s 11 years ago, a decade is 10 years.....let’s subtract, 1 year over a decade is more than a decade. Wow we can’t even do math. 

 

Where did I lie, most thread you’re in is either involving dg or hurney, you stated he used those years as an evaluation process please explain how so when I showed you his stats past 2013 that were better than our WR cast mutiple

years or second too. There was a different oc in 2013 also, did he evaluate that ? Or tell

me how he evaluated 2010 with a bust of a qb and a lame duck coach...please explain, those pedals finna fall off if you keep up at this rate 

[rayzor]

Just wondering why people still arguing which turd smelled worse. 

Both Hurney and gettleman hurt the team in different ways. Both made bad deals and bad decisions.

It's just a shame that we brought Hurney back knowing how much he sucked. Even bigger shame that he's still around. 

We should have moved on from him.... again.

[Mr. Scot]

36 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Just wondering why people still arguing which turd smelled worse. 

Both Hurney and gettleman hurt the team in different ways. Both made bad deals and bad decisions.

It's just a shame that we brought Hurney back knowing how much he sucked. Even bigger shame that he's still around. 

We should have moved on from him.... again.

Discussion of Hurney is relevant for obvious reasons. He still (unfortunately) works here.

Gettleman actually isn't relevant, but gets brought up frequently by two groups: Hurney defenders trying to blame him for team problems and Steve Smith fanboys who are still butthurt even after five years.

Admittedly, both groups are fun to toy with, but they tend to bring little else to the table.

[Toomers]

1 hour ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Yesterday is March 9 2019, Smith last incident was in 2008, let’s do math class, that’s 11 years ago, a decade is 10 years.....let’s subtract, 1 year over a decade is more than a decade. Wow we can’t even do math. 

 

Where did I lie, most thread you’re in is either involving dg or hurney, you stated he used those years as an evaluation process please explain how so when I showed you his stats past 2013 that were better than our WR cast mutiple

years or second too. There was a different oc in 2013 also, did he evaluate that ? Or tell

me how he evaluated 2010 with a bust of a qb and a lame duck coach...please explain, those pedals finna fall off if you keep up at this rate 

And when I showed it was only six years, you still claimed a decade. What does NOW have to do with 2014 when he was cut. I specifically said that and you still ignored it. Because you only read what you want to believe. It’s plain as day up there. 

And STILL no post where I brought Hurney into this. Or once again you would show it. Another post of deflecting away from your lie. Why is it so hard to post one thing I said to bring a Hurney And my niche into play. You can’t. Or you would. You hit your niche of hollering bias when you run out of ideas a little early and on the wrong person.