Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jourdan Rodrigue does not believe we are getting rid of Tory Smith


WarPanthers89

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

 For over 40 years. So why does that mean I’m posting on a site I don’t know exists about a coach who the harshest thing I’ve ever said was on here when I compared him to Rivera. Both teams promptly tanked  the rest of the season. 

  See. The difference is that the Steelers have proven they know how to run a team. So I don’t have to complain. Unlike this team who think that suddenly a GM no other team wants, and ruined the team once before, is going to magically get better at his job. 

  And what does any of this have to do with anything? Another in a long line of deflection.

Just like I thought. You compared Tomlin to Rivera, and I'm supposed to think you love Tomlin, right? 

If you haven't heard of Steelers Depot, I don't know where you (as a Steelers fan) have been. But the suggestion still stands. Go over there and rant about Tomlin and tell people how dumb they are for believing in him. Over here, that will give us a rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

Just like I thought. You compared Tomlin to Rivera, and I'm supposed to think you love Tomlin, right? 

If you haven't heard of Steelers Depot, I don't know where you (as a Steelers fan) have been. But the suggestion still stands. Go over there and rant about Tomlin and tell people how dumb they are for believing in him. Over here, that will give us a rest.

And right on cue......Hurney goes to work

He speaks for himself...

BC9D1BF9-B442-4CF2-B2D5-DD9448784767.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Perhaps, but just because you believe it doesn't make it so. 

Apropos gif though.

Tell you what....for any article, writer, blogger you can find to give this a good grade/review I’ll give you 20. Username bet on the national reaction. Let’s find out. 

  So you agree it’s throwing money away but still don’t want us to complain. It just happened!!!! Stay out if you don’t like it. You screamed all day about it hasn’t happened. So STFU. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Tell you what....for any article, writer, blogger you can find to give this a good grade/review I’ll give you 20. Username bet on the national reaction. Let’s find out. 

  So you agree it’s throwing money away but still don’t want us to complain. It just happened!!!! Stay out if you don’t like it. You screamed all day about it hasn’t happened. So STFU. 

I also said that no one has a crystal ball. Hell, you don't even know the rationale behind their move, and you certainly aren't privy to their plan. Just like I told you rationale that Tepper could use to keep Hurney and Rivera that basically was confirmed by him, I'm sure that reasons I have discussed has undoubtedly factored in their decision to keep Smith. 

But, whine and cry and bitch. I'm not going to lose sleep over it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

I also said that no one has a crystal ball. Hell, you don't even know the rationale behind their move, and you certainly aren't privy to their plan. Just like I told you rationale that Tepper could use to keep Hurney and Rivera that basically was confirmed by him, I'm sure that reasons I have discussed has undoubtedly factored in their decision to keep Smith.

It’s actually not a move. It just makes him like we all thought he was which was signed already. 

   Same principles. I don’t see a point but it’s not an issue yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I also said that no one has a crystal ball. Hell, you don't even know the rationale behind their move, and you certainly aren't privy to their plan. Just like I told you rationale that Tepper could use to keep Hurney and Rivera that basically was confirmed by him, I'm sure that reasons I have discussed has undoubtedly factored in their decision to keep Smith.

That last post of mine was way over the line. Wasn’t pissed at anything but team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw that too--and what you said made sense because there is something like that in the rules--said that he is unlikely to get picked up (and I was not suggesting that we do) and Jones wants to go to a winning team.   After getting beaten to death in NY behind a sub par OL, poor WRs, and brutal fan base, I get it. 
    • True.  Sam and Baker did not do well here but went on to better things under better coaching, circumstances or both.  The real question is, ‘why aren’t the Panthers able to get improved performance out of ‘broken toys’, similar to Minnesota and Tampa? That is a rhetorical question.  I think we know the answer.   [The cultural reference to Pogo dates me, I’ll admit.]
    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of mature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.  Just so you know, I critique and perform research in my job.  I am often amazed at how the numbers do not support my suppositions.  I learned that my impression is often wrong until I look at the data.  In this case, I have considered all the important variables and he should get a shot.  Numbers don't lie--and when you and others resort to twisted name calling directed toward the poster--it verifies my position.  
×
×
  • Create New...