Jourdan Rodrigue does not believe we are getting rid of Tory Smith

[top dawg]

3 minutes ago, Toomers said:

LOL....Tell me the difference between that video and you ranting to leave the “team” alone. It’s exactly what you whine about every day. 

I don't even come on here every day, but when I do I can count on a post from you and your amen corner whining about how dumb and stupid Hurney and Rivera are. Throw in Tepper too! If you don't like the direction of the team, and haven't for it's up and down history, then go root for another one! Go to Steelers Depot and litter the forum with your anti-Tomlin diatribes. 

In the meantime, I'll be rooting for Rivera (Hurney and Tepper) to right the ship after a disappointing season---the Tale of two seasons---due largely to Cam's injury.

[Toomers]

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I don't even come on here every day, but when I do I can count on a post from you and your amen corner whining about how dumb and stupid Hurney and Rivera are. Throw in Tepper too! If you don't like the direction of the team, and haven't for it's up and down history, then go root for another one! Go to Steelers Depot and litter the forum with your anti-Tomlin diatribes. 

In the meantime, I'll be rooting for Rivera (Hurney and Tepper) to right the ship after a disappointing season---the Tale of two seasons---due largely to Cam's injury.

Why in the world would I post anti-Tomlin diatribes on a site I’ve never been to? What deep end have you gone off of? What’s that supposed to mean exactly. 

 And the rest is a perfect exhibit A for exactly what I said. 

“Leave the team alone” 

“Don’t say mean things about us” 

 This ain’t your board, and as you have stated...”you can’t tell me what to do”. So I’ll complain as much as I possibly can. I don’t live in a Disney movie where it sunshine and puppies and everything always works. So excuse me for including facts in decision making. Like I said, attack the issue, not the poster. 

[Mr. Scot]

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

You obviously don't know the definition of rationale, and I'm not going to explain it to you.

Saying that Smith is not worth his contract is subjective. Plain and simple. You probably don't know what that means either, if your history is a good indicator.

[top dawg]

18 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Why in the world would I post anti-Tomlin diatribes on a site I’ve never been to? What deep end have you gone off of? What’s that supposed to mean exactly. 

 And the rest is a perfect exhibit A for exactly what I said. 

“Leave the team alone” 

“Don’t say mean things about us” 

 This ain’t your board, and as you have stated...”you can’t tell me what to do”. So I’ll complain as much as I possibly can. I don’t live in a Disney movie where it sunshine and puppies and everything always works. So excuse me for including facts in decision making. Like I said, attack the issue, not the poster. 

"Attack the issue and not the poster! "

That's rich coming from you and your ilk...

It's totally reasonable to let your feelings of disapproval be known. It's expected. But going on and on and on and on about it is simply annoying. Your inability to actually deal with a situation positively and perhaps even productively is annoying. We don't need to know how you feel about the current leadership of the Panthers every single day. Your schtick of trying to convince people they're dumb or stupid for understanding---not even necessarily agreeing with---moves made by Tepper, Hurney or Rivera is beyond annoying.  Turning everything into "Oh my gosh, this team is so stupid," is annoying. 

But the people that actually want to discuss what is as opposed to what should be, and who look towards the future with any degree of positivity, have learned that you and your ilk are a necessary evil. It's just something that we have to endure. 

 

[top dawg]

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Feel free to Google it! You have that issue.

[Toomers]

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

"Attack the issue and not the poster! "

That's rich coming from you and your ilk...

It's totally reasonable to let your feelings of disapproval to be known. It's expected. But going on and on and on and on about it is simply annoying. Your inability to actually deal with a situation positively and perhaps even productively is annoying. We don't need to know how you feel about the current leadership of the Panthers every single day. Your schtick of trying to convince people they're dumb or stupid for understanding---not even necessarily agreeing with---moves made by Tepper, Hurney or Rivera is beyond annoying.  Turning everything into "Oh my gosh, this team is so stupid," is annoying. 

But the people that actually want to discuss what is as opposed to what should be, and who look towards the future with any degree of positivity, have learned that you and your ilk are a necessary evil. It's just something that we have to endure. 

 

Screw that. I want to know exactly what the anti-Tomlin diatribes mean? We ain’t glossing over this. I want to know exactly what you mean or we can take the next step. 

  

[Mr. Scot]

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Feel free to Google it! You have that issue.

As you wish...

Rational vs Rationale: How to know the difference

[top dawg]

Just now, Toomers said:

Screw that. I want to know exactly what the anti-Tomlin diatribes mean? We ain’t glossing over this. I want to know exactly what you mean or we can take the next step. 

  

Are you a Steelers fan, or have you ever been one? 

 

[Waldo]

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

As you wish...

Rational vs Rationale: How to know the difference

Two beers for two excellent references.

[top dawg]

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

As you wish...

Rational vs Rationale: How to know the difference

Providing a link isn't proving anything.

Just like you tried your best to say that it wasn't rational for Tepper to want to give Hurney and Rivera another swing at the plate, Tepper gave you rationale as to why he did. You may not like his rationale, but it's not "silly" or "moronic" or any other term of your choice. For you to say otherwise is proof positive that you don't understand the term. Understand? Probably not, but I thought that I'd give it a try. 

[Mr. Scot]

Just now, top dawg said:

Providing a link isn't proving anything.

Just like you tried your best to say that it wasn't rational for Tepper to want to give Hurney and Rivera another swing at the plate, Tepper gave you rationale as to why he did. You may not like his rationale, but it's not "silly" or "moronic" or any other term of your choice. For you to say otherwise is proof positive that you don't understand the term. Understand? Probably not, but I thought that I'd give it a try. 

 

 

[Toomers]

Just now, top dawg said:

Are you a Steelers fan, or have you ever been one? 

 

 For over 40 years. So why does that mean I’m posting on a site I don’t know exists about a coach who the harshest thing I’ve ever said was on here when I compared him to Rivera. Both teams promptly tanked  the rest of the season. 

  See. The difference is that the Steelers have proven they know how to run a team. So I don’t have to complain. Unlike this team who think that suddenly a GM no other team wants, and ruined the team once before, is going to magically get better at his job. 

  And what does any of this have to do with anything? Another in a long line of deflection.

[top dawg]

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

 

Didn't even look at it. If it's not Panthers related, it's a total waste of time! 

[CPsinceDay1]

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Didn't even look at it. If it's not Panthers related, it's a total waste of time! 

http://www.nfl.com/videos/up-to-the-minute/0ap3000001021442/Three-pass-rushers-who-could-be-on-the-trade-block