Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Favorite draft prospect


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Shocker said:

If he stays healthy he will be awesome.  Huge IF though.

Big if. I would just rather gamble in the position we are in. Most of the guys in our range are likely to be career role players. Either gamble on an elite talent or project guy. Another role player isn't going to make us a better team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Big if. I would just rather gamble in the position we are in. Most of the guys in our range are likely to be career role players. Either gamble on an elite talent or project guy. Another role player isn't going to make us a better team.

Totally agree and also agree we need a big

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starting to warmup more to Little

Feel his game will be Much better in the pros

He is better suited in the more spread out NBA game playing the 2/3 wing combo 

Vs the more congested college game playing the 3/4 combo playing some down low.

 

Kid has all the tools and defensive energy as Kawhi had coming out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Starting to warmup more to Little

Feel his game will be Much better in the pros

He is better suited in the more spread out NBA game playing the 2/3 wing combo 

Vs the more congested college game playing the 3/4 combo playing some down low.

 

Kid has all the tools and defensive energy as Kawhi had coming out

Where does he play?? You got Miles at SF and a log Jam at shooting guard..

Do we really need to add another wing until MKG and Batum are gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

Where does he play?? You got Miles at SF and a log Jam at shooting guard..

Do we really need to add another wing until MKG and Batum are gone. 

Just wing.

Play 2 wings, Miles at the 3, Little at the 2.

Kind of like Boston with Tatum at the 3 and Brown at the 2

 

I think the Monk train has sailed.  He needs to be a part of the up coming trade package next year.  Bacon backs up Little at the 2

 

 

 

IF Kemba gets resigned

PG: Kemba, Graham

SG: Little, Bacon

SF: Bridges, Batum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...