Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

the answer to our problems


xclr82xtc

Recommended Posts

the eagles are gonna release vick...not official, but it pretty obvious. reid has that same approach to on again off again donovan as fox has to horse boy...

pick up vick, make the pass a threat, get a back that can throw the ball and is a wildcat only player, komoeatu comes back next year ...bam...superbowl anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can not sit there and tell me that delshithead is better than vick!!! not only that, but vick comes cheap, and he has the capability of opening up the middle for even more of a run threat. (remember how many bootleg yards that guy got?) Vick is the only option we have, thats credible, till we can get back with a first round pick. Period. No body getting let go by there teams at the end of the season is worth a damn. and a F/A is to expensive considering jakes contract

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kemo is probably done for his career, and if he does come back next year he will prob be cut due to his cap number. yes I know no cap next year, but he is still making to much money for what he does. Just look at Thomas, he is making the minimum and is doing as good a job as Kemo did.

Also, theres no way in hell we pick up Vick. We want a QB, not a RB who sometimes throws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would think that someone with the name delhomeboy, would not want to hear anything negative about his idol...:beatdeadhorse5::beatdeadhorse5: JAKE SUCKS!!!!! DEAL WITH IT

Jake is not my "idol" my friend...I choose my screen name over five years ago, back when he was actually good.

No, I think there's very few people here who do not think a change needs to be made. But what you are considering is removing a quarterback with bad accuracy and no upside for another quarterback with equally bad accuracy and no upside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake is not my "idol" my friend...I choose my screen name over five years ago, back when he was actually good.

No, I think there's very few people here who do not think a change needs to be made. But what you are considering is removing a quarterback with bad accuracy and no upside for another quarterback with equally bad accuracy and no upside.

rep;)

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Delhomeboy again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you look at vicks stats... his acuracy was fine UNTIL 04...that was when the falcons front started to colaspe. if you also notice, in 04 that was when he started to RUN ALOT more...because he had no protection

with our front ...this guy can put that balls on target.

sorry, copy paste didnt work...here is the link

http://www.nfl.com/players/michaelvick/careerstats?id=VIC311467

even with lots of int's from tryin to run and throw, he still had over a 70 passer rating...comeon guys, give this guy his due...he aint tom brady, but he aint jake delhomme either

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gambling in the first three rounds just makes the building effort longer. So you have to weigh that into the equation. Ultimately, you want to get to a situation where those picks net you at least one starter/starting caliber player and two very good rotational players(at LEAST) almost every year. That can get us back on track. So if you are having to just take a raw gamble in those rounds, versus a guy that can help you win games....I don't think we are in a good spot to be able to afford to do that. Definitely not year after year.
    • I mean, someone has to start. If we are rolling out Brycd for 17 games in 2025, I suppose that means we will get to watch the rebuilding process all over again. You can try and get another veteran QB in free agency but they will also have a salary attached.  If you want to take a gamble on another young and bust QB, that's fine but that also likely leads to more rebuilding after the 2025 season. Those guys so rarely pan out. So what is left? Draft a QB? Sure, maybe. But this isn't an impressive QB draft on paper and they are going to be walking into a challenging situation. Dalton as starter in 2025 isn't waving the white flag, IMO. It's just acknowledging that we have to start attempting to build a franchise.  That said, I would never be giving out $20+ mil contracts for older QB's(Flacco, Dalton, etc). That ship has sailed. 
    • I guess bottom line is we need to give Canales a shot at His QB. However they find it.  Ideally we would sign an undervalued vet that Canales knows what he is getting, and start looking hard for one we can grab at good value and groom. And for me it is okay to burn a pick on a miss just don't cripple your future. Hitting on your other picks should allow for a long shot every so often. 
×
×
  • Create New...