Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some notes from my source involving the NFL draft


Verge

Recommended Posts

I asked him specifically about Carolina, and what he had heard from the combine, it kind of echoed his thought that they would take an offensive lineman, interior dline, or secondary in the first round, with o-line being more likely. Whichever tackle falls to us or the center from NC state make a lot of sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Verge said:

I asked him specifically about Carolina, and what he had heard from the combine, it kind of echoed his thought that they would take an offensive lineman or secondary in the first round, with o-line being more likely. Whichever tackle falls to us or the center from NC state make a lot of sense. 

Taking the Center at 16 is a sweet spot either way. Anchor that line for years to come and get dline second. Unless a OT or Edge falls. It's the logical choice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ivan The Awesome said:

Verge, does your buddy think there will be a rush for QBs this year? I think there will be and that will push top d line talent down to us. 

He stated the three in the top 12 thing, but beyond that, one will fall to the middle of the round 1, which also helps us. 

If you are looking at dline talent, there is a ton in the draft, so one would be bound to make it to us
Bosa
Sweat 
Gary
Burns 
Ferrell 
Ferguson 
Allen 

If you throw in the three quarterbacks, and likely a couple of o-line, and interior guys, one is bound to fall to us. The question is, will we take one, as I haven't really heard anything about an edge guy, just interior dline, safety, and o-line.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Verge said:

He stated the three in the top 12 thing, but beyond that, one will fall to the middle of the round 1, which also helps us. 

If you are looking at dline talent, there is a ton in the draft, so one would be bound to make it to us
Bosa
Sweat 
Gary
Burns 
Ferrell 
Ferguson 
Allen 

If you throw in the three quarterbacks, and likely a couple of o-line, and interior guys, one is bound to fall to us. The question is, will we take one, as I haven't really heard anything about an edge guy, just interior dline, safety, and o-line.

 

Not sure I would be comfortable with Ferguson or Allen at 16.  

I will take your other comment though with Jonah Williams falling to 16.  Yes please. I get the feeling that dude will work his ass off.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Verge said:

I asked him specifically about Carolina, and what he had heard from the combine, it kind of echoed his thought that they would take an offensive lineman, interior dline, or secondary in the first round, with o-line being more likely. Whichever tackle falls to us or the center from NC state make a lot of sense. 

This one kind of stunned me

Your guy didnt seem to feel we would take a edge rusher (which is presumed our 1A. Biggest need) but said feels ww Could take a Interior DL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ncfan said:

This one kind of stunned me

Your guy didnt seem to feel we would take a edge rusher (which is presumed our 1A. Biggest need) but said feels ww Could take a Interior DL.

Makes me wonder if they plan on making some free agent signings to shore up DE or they really do believe the "answer is on the roster." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Makes me wonder if they plan on making some free agent signings to shore up DE or they really do believe the "answer is on the roster." 

Problem is

The market for edge guys

Just to get a half decent Edge rusher is going to take atleast 80% of our remaining cap (17 mil), to where we wont be able to even sign our Draft picks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Problem is

The market for edge guys

Just to get a half decent Edge rusher is going to take atleast 80% of our remaining cap (17 mil), to where we wont be able to even sign our Draft picks 

Not if many of the higher contracts that could be adjusted to allow more monies to be added to cap so more players can be signed and possibly enough left over to pay the drafted players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

When LOVE is your best DT, you need interior DL---that makes sense.  Interior pressure and stopping the run comes first.  Remember the rule--inside out, front to back.

Yeah so we pay Poe a big contract, have a first rounder in Butler, KK so where all the defensive ends at?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ncfan said:

Problem is

 The market for edge guys

 Just to get a half decent Edge rusher is going to take atleast 80% of our remaining cap (17 mil), to where we wont be able to even sign our Draft picks 

They may opt for Gettleman dumpster dive, however. TBH, I am not a big fan of signing a mega-contract for a pass rusher at the moment, especially in free agency where the options have gotten a lot slimmer for guys that will be worth a mega-contract. I would rather get a guy through the draft.

All that said, if they think there is a dire need at DE they will make moves in free agency, regardless. You can't "hope" that a starting quality DE falls to you at 16 and that just works out. That is how you end up cutting a Pro Bowl CB and then panic drafting two CB's to start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

They may opt for Gettleman dumpster dive, however. TBH, I am not a big fan of signing a mega-contract for a pass rusher at the moment, especially in free agency where the options have gotten a lot slimmer for guys that will be worth a mega-contract. I would rather get a guy through the draft.

All that said, if they think there is a dire need at DE they will make moves in free agency, regardless. You can't "hope" that a starting quality DE falls to you at 16 and that just works out. That is how you end up cutting a Pro Bowl CB and then panic drafting two CB's to start.

I have asked, but haven't seen a response.  To be fair I haven't looked into it either...

But, how many DE's drafted outside of the top 15 have made an immediate impact lately?  Or even in their second season?

If I have time, I'll go back through it, but I'm not counting on an impact DE at 16, hoping, but not counting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thefuzz said:

 I have asked, but haven't seen a response.  To be fair I haven't looked into it either...

 But, how many DE's drafted outside of the top 15 have made an immediate impact lately?  Or even in their second season?

 If I have time, I'll go back through it, but I'm not counting on an impact DE at 16, hoping, but not counting.

Well what do you define as "immediate impact?" If you can define some benchmark stats(sacks, QB rushes, games started, tackles, forced fumbles, etc, etc, etc) then I can put up a list. Do you want to limit it to the first round or basically 16th through end of draft? How many years do you want to go back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...