Some notes from my source involving the NFL draft

[TheSpecialJuan]

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Same. If we pick Dillard or Little in the 1st... just ugh.

poo, I'd be thrilled.  RT- Taylor Moton   RG- Trai Turner   C- Paradis   LG- Daryl Williams   LT- Dillard 

[LinvilleGorge]

15 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

poo, I'd be thrilled.  RT- Taylor Moton   RG- Trai Turner   C- Paradis   LG- Daryl Williams   LT- Dillard 

I just think Dillard and Little are high probabilities to bust. Guys like them are exactly why 1st round OTs have become such a gamble in the last decade or so. All the physical talent, very little actual skill.

[SOJA]

Unless Burns falls to us at 16 I think Dillard is the pick 

Would not be surprised if we go back to back Oline with a Guard in the second 

[TheSpecialJuan]

21 minutes ago, SOJA said:

Unless Burns falls to us at 16 I think Dillard is the pick 

Would not be surprised if we go back to back Oline with a Guard in the second 

Sounds good but then we would HAVE to reach for an EDGE player in later rounds

[LinvilleGorge]

2 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Sounds good but then we would HAVE to reach for an EDGE player in later rounds

Honestly, nothing about it sounds good. This is possibly the strongest EDGE/DL class ever. It's an OL class thats weak at the top but has decent depth. This definitely isn't the class to reach on an OT in the 1st.

[Icege]

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Same. If we pick Dillard or Little in the 1st... just ugh.

Mang... Little had better not even sniff the 1st round.

I mean, if I can give Butler as long as he has had to finally agree that he is a bust, I can do the same for Dillard... but not for Little. Especially if Ford is available.

Max Scharping in the late 2nd or early 3rd at the latest pls.

[bobcat91]

If the edge guys are gone, get a DT, LB or S after trading back. I dont care for any of the LT in this draft

[Proudiddy]

Man, I am really scared of Dillard...  and i still don't understand why we would take OL at 16.  I get Daryl is on a 1-year deal, and there is a fine line between knowing when a position is a strength and knowing when to invest heavily in it to develop young talent for eventual succession...  but, I feel we have done enough with the OL in FA that we REALLY need to look elsewhere at 16, namely the edge.  We had/have enough holes across the board that #16 needs to play and have an immediate impact.

[steven8989]

2 hours ago, Verge said:

He is reiterating the idea we will pick oline in the first.

I hope ur source is wrong because that would be a terrible pick at 16. Trade back with a team that wants a QB to tail end of first maybe. No way I would take Dillard there. I think we would lose alot of Hurney 2.0 people around here lol.

[SOJA]

I've actually come around on Dillard and I'd be fine if he was the pick . Still rather have Jonah Williams, Burns or Sweat, but I'm not sure any of those guys will be there. 

 

TJ Hockenson is another name that I haven't seen thrown around much I'd be completely fine with 

[steven8989]

Just now, SOJA said:

I've actually come around on Dillard and I'd be fine if he was the pick . Still rather have Jonah Williams, Burns or Sweat, but I'm not sure any of those guys will be there. 

 

TJ Hockenson is another name that I haven't seen thrown around much I'd be completely fine with 

I don't think we would go TE after just getting Thomas 

[SOJA]

1 minute ago, steven8989 said:

I don't think we would go TE after just getting Thomas 

I'd be completely fine with two TE sets especially considering how our number 1,2,3 WRs are smaller guys

[Proudiddy]

Imagine how much easier this decision would be at #9 instead of #16.

[MrBubba]

I think Ron said something a few weeks ago, about how Indy had rebuilt their offensive line.  Seemed like a  "sounds like a good idea, let's do that" kinda comment.