Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyler Murray at #1

Shocker

By Shocker,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

Kingsbury was quoted before twking the Cardinals job that he'd take Murray #1 overall.

I thought all along that Rosen was a bust, but they spent the #10 overall pick on him last year. Would Keim be willing to pick another QB #1 overall one year later for his new coach? I have to think the QB situation was a hot topic of conversation during the interview process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sub Zero Rising Star

Sub Zero

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Lot of talk about Kyler to Arizona at #1.  I pray this happens, pushes down the Edge dudes but would love  some talk about this guy going first.  I just cannot see it.  I wouldn’t pick him period.  

More QB picks in the top 15 more pass rushing options for us..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I have a huge problem thinking this guy will succeed in this league.  QB hungry is an understatement.  No way he can run without getting destroyed.  I so hope Zona takes him.

Yeah, CMC was supposed to get destroyed too and he and Murray are basically the same size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Will add we had this discussion last season with the number 1 pick Mayfield and it was not possible.  Is Zona that crazy?

Looks like the Browns finally got one right. Now let's watch them inevitably fug it up somehow because they're the Browns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Really?  

CMC was 5'11" 202 at the Combine, Murray was 5'10" 207.

The bigger guys have more bulk to absorb the punishment but sometimes the smaller guys are slippery enough to avoid most of the punishment. Barry Sanders was 5'8" 200.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jessicasmith0
      Does JetBlue have free cancellation?

      By jessicasmith0 · Posted

      https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • tukafan21
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • Carolina Mike
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...