Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Olsen Debating Retiring


NJPanthers12

Recommended Posts

Tony Romo and Greg Olsen on MNF would make me happy.

Only, you know, with Greg playing for 1 more season and helping mentor Ian Thomas. Then the two of them as a commentary duo (Olsen/Romo)

But if that foot is donezo, move on and make your money, Greg! President Obama recognized you. You're good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see where you all are coming from, but here are some underlying factors nobody is considering---

Greg has played half the games over the past 2 years.  Rehab is painful, humiliating, monotonous, and frustrating.  Mentally, it is very taxing, which is why I appreciate TD so much.  If Olsen knows there is an  option where he can stay near the game and not worry about injury any longer, it has to be tempting.  

ESPN may not have an offer on the table in a year.  Tom Brady, Eli Manning, or Drew Brees could retire and grab the microphone.

A bad season could hurt Olsen's stock.  I doubt it, but if he pulled a Jackie Smith or Bill Buckner... (youngsters: Google those names)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I see where you all are coming from, but here are some underlying factors nobody is considering---

Greg has played half the games over the past 2 years.  Rehab is painful, humiliating, monotonous, and frustrating.  Mentally, it is very taxing, which is why I appreciate TD so much.  If Olsen knows there is an  option where he can stay near the game and not worry about injury any longer, it has to be tempting.  

ESPN may not have an offer on the table in a year.  Tom Brady, Eli Manning, or Drew Brees could retire and grab the microphone.

A bad season could hurt Olsen's stock.  I doubt it, but if he pulled a Jackie Smith or Bill Buckner... (youngsters: Google those names)

 

I doubt a bad season would hurt his stock as an announcer/analyst, but 100% agree with everything else you said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Harbingers said:

This is just dumb. Networks aren’t going to pay him more than he would make for another season. Even if he ends up on IR. 

True, but that one opening may be the one you can ride out for a long time for way more money or leverage for other long term gigs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing worth noting is that the Panthers don't HAVE to pursue that bonus money. They could let it ride and it would be the same as if we cut him. The other option would be to work out an injury settlement. If Greg decides to retire to pursue announcing that might be the most palatable option for both parties. Honestly if I'm Hurney I might preemptively float that option out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

No chance he’s going to retire, too much guaranteed money in 2019. Way more than he can make in a TV gig. That’ll be there one year later.

It might have been different if Hurney didn’t give him $12m guaranteed coming off an injury filled 2017. 

I honestly think that was the lynchpin that cost Gettleman his job and it was how Hurney slid back into his old office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is why it's probably going to be hard to trade down. This draft is fairly light on top tier talent but pretty deep in talent of that next tier down. I don't think there's going to be a lot of teams clamoring to move up and numerous teams might be entertaining moving down. Not a good market to trade down if that's the case. 
    • And if they can't find a reasonable trade down (I think we would need a 2nd rounder this year bare minimum to make any trade down worth it). I would definitely expect Dan to trade UP for an EDGE or LB in the top half of R2. Just makes too much sense. We also have a plethora of mid round picks to use as ammo. 
    • I don't mean to make this a mock draft thread particularly,  but every time I do a mock I have been investigating the talent that goes off the board between picks 8 and our low 2nd rounder pick 57. There is a gargantuan amount of talent still left on the board in the top half of the 2nd round every time I do one. Losing our original 2nd round pick to the Bears as the last pick of the Bryce trade stings badly .  I'm particularly looking at elite players like Carson Schwesinger (LB), Luther Burden (WR), Matthew Golden (WR), Maxwell Hairston (CB) , Nick Scourton , Landon Jackson, Donavan Ezeraku (all DEs/OLBs) . The sweet spot in this draft really feels like pick 15 to 40 - ish. This is why the Bears should be making bank with this draft. I don't know how realistic a trade down is from 8, but if we could pick up any teams higher 2nd rounder and still grab their 1st? We'd be cooking with gas man.  Say for example we get Tet McMillan at pick 8, if you wait all the way to 57 you stand the chance of not getting any impact pass rushers in this draft. And I don't think this team can afford that.  I'd personally love for them to take a break from drafting wrs in R1 or R2 (i think we've taken one in the top 2 rounds in the majority of the past few years), and stick to repairing the nfls worse defense in history (in terms of total points against iirc, or was it yards? Also included my most recent mock as an example . Don't put too much into the  late round selections lol  
×
×
  • Create New...