Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mcshay’s new mock.


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

42CAC3DF-9DA2-4F91-A8C3-F3BCD9981BF1.thumb.jpeg.8e188b85c6db4a978a6ab2f2c6c84a66.jpeg

Well if ur a Mcshay Guy(I am I love him and Kiper personally) then It looks as if defensive ends are sliding. We’re in luck because olinemen have moved up boards. He has Gary as the second defensive lineman off the board and you all know how I feel about him..

All you Ferrell hypers could be in luck. But I would much rather Have any of the others Sweat beyond Gary than a one year guy playing on a line of First rounders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ferrell had 11.5 sacks this season and 27 in his college career. Hall had 3.5 his final college season and 14 in his entire college career.

Hall had the measurables, but there's a reason why he was available in the third. We took him as a project hoping we could develop him. He just wasn't a football player. He never was.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

I said you Farrell fans might be in luck. If you like Overacheivers with less than great physical tools he’s a fine guy. I think he’s basically deshaun Hall playing alongside Garrett myself

Hall wasnt wrecking the top OTs in the draft

Austin Bryant is more like Hall

 

Ferrell has been lucky to play with that DL.  But you can say any player playing along with ______ helped him at any major program.

 

Ferrell matched up against the top OL in the draft in the national championship who some people have going as high as top 5.  And Ferrell wrecked him

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Ferrell had 11.5 sacks this season and 27 in his college career. Hall had 3.5 his final college season and 14 in his entire college career.

Hall had the measurables, but there's a reason why he was available in the third. We took him as a project hoping we could develop him. He just wasn't a football player. He never was.

 

I don’t put much stock into Statistics when judging a guy. Of course they are indicators when a player is an elite athletes and the numbers are there, but when your playing on a first round line and everyone else double teamed and your one on one u should win more matchup. Not saying he was never doubled but, he had plenty of chances to put up numbers.

If he runs a 4.6-4-7 I will cut him a break. I need to see some atleticism to put him ahead of sweat at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Why the F would you start a mock draft thread and omit the only team anyone on here cares about?

not making the huddle better 

Because it’s the off-season and everyone is talking prospects not who we don’t know will be there at 16. Mock drafts are a big guessing game but, they can show a general idea of the top prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Hall wasnt wrecking the top OTs in the draft

Austin Bryant is more like Hall

 

Ferrell has been lucky to play with that DL.  But you can say playing along with ______ helped him at any major program.

 

Ferrell matched up against the top OL in the draft who some people have going as high as top 5.  And Ferrell wrecked him

 

He’s the hall of there defensive line, Lawrence and Wilkins were better football players than him. They garnered more attention and will probably go higher in the draft than him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, micnificent28 said:

He’s the hall of there defensive line, Lawrence and Wilkins were better football players than him. They garnered more attention and will probably go higher in the draft than him.

Actually if youve watched Clemson games

Theyve always said Ferrell was the besg player on the Line.  Said the staff has stated it as well.  A lot of the interior gets help from his presence on the edge.

 

Austin Bryant is the Hall, freak athlete.  Doesnt put the big #s but when he does mainly due to the other guys.

 

Those interior DL didnt help him punking the top OL in the draft in the national championship game.

He was abusing Jonah Williams worst than Garrett abused Cam Robinson, and Williams is Much Much more highly touted than Robinson.  That interior had nothing to do with that.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

If he is the Hall are you saying that Bryant is better than him?

No sir. I don’t mean Ferrell is terrible and he is a first rounder. I mean he is the” other guy” and benefits from having elite talent around him. I only don’t care for him when compared to the other options at defensive end because, he probably isn’t a to end athlete which is a big thing when you talking first half of the first round. He’s decent though. You could definitely do worse.

if we talking hall vs Farrell straight up then Farrell easy.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...