Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PC Builders..


Ivan The Awesome

Recommended Posts

Sup guys. I haven't built a PC before but one of my newphews recently got me into building them. Not necessarily for me but for him and his buddies. He's currently in college and is getting an engineering degree.

 

So I finally decided that this year is the year I build my own rig. 

 

I decided to make it a multiple task build. Which is why I decided to got with a Ryzen Chip build. If I was going to strictly game I probably would have gone with Intel. 

 

Do any of you build your own PC and gone with Ryzen and if so what type of Chip and MoBo did you go with. I am currently trying to make a $700 or less build to start up but have plans for upgrading. 

 

I am open to suggestions as far as MoBo. I'm still learning and I would appreciate any advice and help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When looking at motherboards, first, figure out what you want to do:

https://www.amd.com/en/products/chipsets-am4

Looking at your budget, you can find a good B350 for a decent price.  Just make sure it has all the slots you need for your storage, cards, cooling, etc.

BTW, just saw this on pcpartpicker.  $700 Ryzen 5 build

https://pcpartpicker.com/guide/vpYcCJ/modest-amd-gaming-build

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dex said:

A good GPU alone costs $700. I would increase your budget a bit for a decent build. You don't even save that much money now a days building as opposed to buying a pre build. It ain't 2005.

Let's not get crazy here, you don't have to spend $700 to get a "good" GPU lol.

In fact you can find a GPU between 200-300 that can play most things out, unless you want to play in 4k or something, even then you're looking at 300-400 or something.       You can definitely get a GPU for $700 but it's not needed for gaming.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zaximus said:

Let's not get crazy here, you don't have to spend $700 to get a "good" GPU lol.

In fact you can find a GPU between 200-300 that can play most things out, unless you want to play in 4k or something, even then you're looking at 300-400 or something.       You can definitely get a GPU for $700 but it's not needed for gaming.  

I'm rocking a 1080TI so $700 is conservative lol. GPU prices shot up after the rise of Bitcoin. I just think it's smart for him to future proof his hardware.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dex said:

A good GPU alone costs $700. I would increase your budget a bit for a decent build. You don't even save that much money now a days building as opposed to buying a pre build. It ain't 2005.

LOL WTF are you talking about. 

 

I built my son a Ryzen rig for Christmas. You can get a good GPU for under 200. Runs Fortnight on high settings at 100 frames. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

LOL WTF are you talking about. 

 

I built my son a Ryzen rig for Christmas. You can get a good GPU for under 200. Runs Fortnight on high settings at 100 frames. 

LMAOOOO Fork Knife is not a GPU intensive game dad. But sure you can built a budget rig for cheap Ivan. Just make sure the motherboard you purchase is at least future proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Dex said:

I'm rocking a 1080TI so $700 is conservative lol. GPU prices shot up after the rise of Bitcoin. I just think it's smart for him to future proof his hardware.

Way overkill for most things gaming that most people will need.    You only need that right now for VR and 4K and whatnot that most people don't care about.

I would never get a cheap video card, but, I'd get a mid to mid-high video card.    Probably 300ish if you want some future proofing.     Maybe 400 if you have the budget.      This will play pretty much anything at high settings minus VR or crazy scenarios.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dex said:

LMAOOOO Fork Knife is not a GPU intensive game dad. But sure you can built a budget rig for cheap Ivan. Just make sure the motherboard you purchase is at least future proof.

Using a GPU as overcompensation is weird.

 

You have a small peen.

Love you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's not turn this into a PC Master Race thread because I think we could actually have a good conversation. I built my PC back in December 2016 for around $1700. Here's what went into it: https://pcpartpicker.com/user/nlannin3/saved/DkCLkL

No matter what you do @Ivan The Awesome I would use PC Part Picker to, at least on the surface, determine if the parts you're buying are compatible.

I'm not a Ryzen guy, so I can't offer advice in that specific type of built. However, I think it would benefit if you told us what you plan on doing. You already said it's not going to just be a gaming build...what are the other things you plan on using it for? What games do you actually plan on playing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zaximus said:

Way overkill for most things gaming that most people will need.    You only need that right now for VR and 4K

Not true. You want to run a AAA game at 1080 or 1440 at a stable 60fps on High to Ultra settings you're going to need a high end card with a minimum of 4G of dedicated GPU memory depending on how much RAM you have. If he wants to play CSGO on low settings at a stable 60 FPS then sure he can get a $200 GPU. I don't own stock in the GPU market I'm giving him legitimate advice. Don't just listen to us though Ivan do your own research and think about exactly what you want to use this computer for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Using a GPU as overcompensation is weird.

 

 

  Spoiler Alert!

 

You have a small peen.

 

  Spoiler Alert!

 

Love you

 

 

 

 

You take more selfies than a female.

 

*Spoiler alert drop down thing*

You're insecure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...