Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF Mock, Brian Burns again


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

Here is the most recent mock from PFF

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/draft-pff-2019-nfl-mock-draft-3

Brian Burns again

Not saying that is who I would pick but some people/sites seem really high on him.

Other interesting notes:

Has Baker as the first CB.  Still has Greedy in top 10.  Murphy, CB out of Washington at 10.  Personally I would consider any of the 3 at 16 depending on who else is there.

He has Devin White falling all the way to 20, would surprise me.

Thompson(S) in the top 15.  I really don't think the Clemson game is going to drop him out of the first.

Has Burns, Polite, and Ximones as the edge players in the last half of the first.  No Sweat, Allen, or Ferguson in the first.

Way too early to put too much stock in all of these mocks, but what else do we have to do.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This pick would terrify me. Undersized pass rushers out of FSU have a pretty terrible track record in the NFL and undersized pass rushers drafted by Hurney also have a terrible track record in the NFL. 

The only way I'd want to seriously consider Burns is if Rivera is willing to mix up his defensive looks and actually incorporate a 4-3/3-4 hybrid defense like we were promised when he was initially hired. If we're still going to run a D based on 4-3 concepts, Burns just isn't a scheme fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really interested in seeing Burns at the combine.  It’s easy to see his weight and say he doesn’t  fit us but not ready to completely write him off yet.  Long frame and good speed.  Appears to have some nice pass rush skills.  Definitely someone to watch...Polite as well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This pick would terrify me. Undersized pass rushers out of FSU have a pretty terrible track record in the NFL and undersized pass rushers drafted by Hurney also have a terrible track record in the NFL. 

The only way I'd want to seriously consider Burns is if Rivera is willing to mix up his defensive looks and actually incorporate a 4-3/3-4 hybrid defense like we were promised when he was initially hired. If we're still going to run a D based on 4-3 concepts, Burns just isn't a scheme fit.

It's not like Hurney was stupid enough to draft Everette Brown...checks records...poo!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This pick would terrify me. Undersized pass rushers out of FSU have a pretty terrible track record in the NFL and undersized pass rushers drafted by Hurney also have a terrible track record in the NFL. 

The only way I'd want to seriously consider Burns is if Rivera is willing to mix up his defensive looks and actually incorporate a 4-3/3-4 hybrid defense like we were promised when he was initially hired. If we're still going to run a D based on 4-3 concepts, Burns just isn't a scheme fit.

Total agreement.  The weird thing is the second Wilks and McDermott got out of here, they installed defenses with the hybrid concept similar to what Chicago and San Diego are doing. 

I do want to advise people to wait on just saying every guy who isn't 6'5 and 270+ should be avoided, the guys coming out are different breeds these days and we just need to identify who's going to be a stud in a 4-3.  That being said, an FSU edge rusher is red flag in itself.  Extreme caution here.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather have Jochai Polite over him if we are going to a 3-4.  Polite has great production analytics.  Not sure about Burns. Also like Polites tape better. 

I would mind these guys.  That would mean we would be going to more hybrid stuff.  At least a new wrinkle.  Running a 4-3 with a successful record makes it difficult to backfill that DE position.  The 3-4 OLB seem to be all over that damn boards last couple of years. 

Hell backfilleg the DE position even with our up and down track record has been tough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, SOJA said:

If Ferrell is somehow, miraculously, available at 16 the Huddle should collectively start sprinting to Nashville to cross out whoever tf Hurney is about to draft and put in the card for ferrell 

I’d did a fan speak draft last night when he was still available at 16.  But that was from the Draftek guys board.  I think those guys must be living under a flipping rock with those. rankings.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Waldo said:

Does PFF know we dont run a 3-4?

I used to be on the 4-3 only bandwagon but I wouldn't mind the switch now. If there is no switch, we dont need this guy.

I would guess they do, just like Kiper does.

I haven't really watched the guy but I'm guessing they think the has the frame to carry 250-260 easily.

Combine will be very interesting for these guys.  We'll get some true numbers.

I know its just a highlight video but if you really think he can carry 255 I can see why some people are really high on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Soooo many bad turnovers again. Luckily Martin played well.  
    • Yes. Cade 100% tripped and pitched it to Mafah.  That’s not in dispute.  We agree on that.  Mafah got the ball, fell to the ground and then attempted to complete the rest of the play….which was the lateral to the WR on the end around.  You are calling the lateral from Mafah to the end around WR the ball popping up.   It was whistled dead.   Then they ran another play.  the review then awarded the ball to SC after we ran another play for what happened after a play was whistled dead.   How does that part work lol?  How do you recover a ball if a play was whistled dead for a downed player prior to a recovery?  I think the refs screwed Clemson twice.   That’s not why they lost.  Please don’t think that is my argument.   They lost because Cade chocked and panicked at the end.  They lost because Sellers should have been put on the ground for a loss countless times and they didn’t.  They lost because our over loyal Dabo wouldn’t bench his favorite hurt RB.    Clemson lost for lots of reasons. SC deserved to win.  Those calls were bad though IMO.  They exist in every game. 
    • I can’t recall an NBA team with this many injuries.  It’s getting absurd at this point
×
×
  • Create New...