Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, you wonder what Tepper is up to.......?


sml1950

Recommended Posts

....or down to.  His 3rd Q filing for Appoloosa report a 35% decline in value!!!! and this before the last 3months which were among the worst on record:

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4223833-tracking-david-teppers-appaloosa-management-portfolio-q3-2018-update

 

He apparently has liquidated many positions and has to be worried about redemptions as much as the volatility of the market.  So following Rivera and Hurney are WAY behind following the tweets from DC.  If he wants to replace anyone, it’s the bipolar guy sitting behind the Resolute desk in the Oval Office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, sml1950 said:

....or down to.  His 3rd Q filing for Appoloosa report a 35% decline in value!!!! and this before the last 3months which were among the worst on record:

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4223833-tracking-david-teppers-appaloosa-management-portfolio-q3-2018-update

 

He apparently has liquidated many positions and has to be worried about redemptions as much as the volatility of the market.  So following Rivera and Hurney are WAY behind following the tweets from DC.  If he wants to replace anyone, it’s the bipolar guy sitting behind the Resolute desk in the Oval Office.

I kinda pointed this out back when folks were screaming that Tepper needed to come out and address them right now about RR and MH. 

SMH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, sml1950 said:

....or down to.  His 3rd Q filing for Appoloosa report a 35% decline in value!!!! and this before the last 3months which were among the worst on record:

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4223833-tracking-david-teppers-appaloosa-management-portfolio-q3-2018-update

 

He apparently has liquidated many positions and has to be worried about redemptions as much as the volatility of the market.  So following Rivera and Hurney are WAY behind following the tweets from DC.  If he wants to replace anyone, it’s the bipolar guy sitting behind the Resolute desk in the Oval Office.

He has been saying he just hoarding cash for the past 3 months. He has some positions but he been waiting to go lower. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, sml1950 said:

....or down to.  His 3rd Q filing for Appoloosa report a 35% decline in value!!!! and this before the last 3months which were among the worst on record:

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4223833-tracking-david-teppers-appaloosa-management-portfolio-q3-2018-update

 

He apparently has liquidated many positions and has to be worried about redemptions as much as the volatility of the market.  So following Rivera and Hurney are WAY behind following the tweets from DC.  If he wants to replace anyone, it’s the bipolar guy sitting behind the Resolute desk in the Oval Office.

I think you might misunderstand what's going on here.

The value of the investments held by Appaloosa is 35% less than the last time they filed the same report.  This is driven by him selling off a lot of positions and going to cash.

Example: 

Filing 1:  Investor has 10 different positions worth $10 each..."portfolio value" = $100. 

Filing 2:  Investor has 6 positions worth $10 each..."portfolio value" = $60.  Cash = $40.  

In both cases total value = $100.  The "portfolio value" is down 40% but no money has been lost.

No idea if he has made or lost money on an absolute basis but he's not down 35%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GeorgeHanson said:

I think you might misunderstand what's going on here.

The value of the investments held by Appaloosa is 35% less than the last time they filed the same report.  This is driven by him selling off a lot of positions and going to cash.

Example: 

Filing 1:  Investor has 10 different positions worth $10 each..."portfolio value" = $100. 

Filing 2:  Investor has 6 positions worth $10 each..."portfolio value" = $60.  Cash = $40.  

In both cases total value = $100.  The "portfolio value" is down 40% but no money has been lost.

No idea if he has made or lost money on an absolute basis but he's not down 35%.

Thanks for putting that in a way that's understandable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GeorgeHanson said:

I think you might misunderstand what's going on here.

The value of the investments held by Appaloosa is 35% less than the last time they filed the same report.  This is driven by him selling off a lot of positions and going to cash.

Example: 

Filing 1:  Investor has 10 different positions worth $10 each..."portfolio value" = $100. 

Filing 2:  Investor has 6 positions worth $10 each..."portfolio value" = $60.  Cash = $40.  

In both cases total value = $100.  The "portfolio value" is down 40% but no money has been lost.

No idea if he has made or lost money on an absolute basis but he's not down 35%.

Excellent explanation, thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Thanks for putting that in a way that's understandable.

Sure thing.

One other thing to keep in mind as it goes to Appaloosa (and other hedge funds), they don't have to report the cash position, nor do they have to report their short positions. 

Clearly Tepper has been taking money off the table on the long side (makes money if stock price goes up), and I'm highly confident he's got his foot on the gas and is simultaneously adding to his book of short positions (makes money if the stock price goes down).

For those who might own a stock or two and want to see if Tepper owns any of the same names, all his long positions can be viewed here: 

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1656456/000165645618000007/xslForm13F_X01/Form13FInfoTable.xml

Market volatility is something guys like Tepper thrive on....I suspect he's having a good year (but that's just a guess).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And we just started playing competitive football. Now look we beat a decent team. We can celebrate winning, it will be ok…
    • It doesn't matter if you give him a new WR1. To do it you have to devoted MORE resources to him. At some point you have to stop or there's nothing left for the defense. Our defense looks like scrubs because that's what we've got because we've spent a shitload on offense. He got a 1st round WR and a shiny new RB in round 2.  Bryce had a couple of good games but we are not competing against the Chiefs or Eagles. They're headed to the playoffs with realistic SB aspirations and we're headed to a top 10 pick. Those teams have competed for an entire season where the Panthers have ummm... They've almost gotten to as many wins as Matt Rhule in a season.  Would you rather have Bryce or Lamar? Because we've spent more on Bryce and to build around him than what it would have cost to trade for Lamar.  This team can't get better when it's having to devote everything to making it possible for our #1 QB god to play average NFL football.  I may end up being wrong and Bryce may become the GOAT. But one thing you won't see me doing is flip flopping on where I stand every couple of weeks because he has good or bad games. I think Bryce is our version of Daniel Jones and I think we're going to fug ourselves pretending he's Pat Mahomes. 
×
×
  • Create New...