Anderson wasn't good enough for Carolina

[panthers55]

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

The only one changing anything is you. Using “it must have been” is not fact. That’s what you think. 

  At that point, CJ was like a backup QB. For the position with the most injuries. Even if he didn’t play, he wAs valuable. If CMC goes down, what was the plan after? And why did we spend money to do it? 

  What is what if about having a backup RB? Was it to give CAP 2 more carries. Or “needing to get a RB” now to spell CMC. That was the coach. 

 Bu, no matter what, the organization is always right. 

The organization isn't always right but they aren't always wrong and the coaches and staff aren't incompetent as you suggest either. The answer is in between which critics here want to characterize taking extreme positions to further their agenda 

[DeeJay]

On 1/12/2019 at 7:26 PM, KillerKat said:

CJ misses 1 reception, gets sent to Rivera's dog house and not played again then eventually cut.

Funchess drops 5 passes in a game and continues to get playing time.

Rivera is a fuging clown.

Love that pic because its true lol

[Toomers]

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

The organization isn't always right but they aren't always wrong and the coaches and staff aren't incompetent as you suggest either. The answer is in between which critics here want to characterize taking extreme positions to further their agenda 

So what’s my agenda then. If I praise/bash both GMs, Rivera, everyone? What agenda do Ihave? Yours is obvious. Homerism. Anything ever said against the team also isn’t always wrong either. Doesn’t keep you from chastising anyone with an opinion not towing the company line. Some people defended Shula. Imagine that. What agenda did they have?

[panthers55]

32 minutes ago, Toomers said:

So what’s my agenda then. If I praise/bash both GMs, Rivera, everyone? What agenda do Ihave? Yours is obvious. Homerism. Anything ever said against the team also isn’t always wrong either. Doesn’t keep you from chastising anyone with an opinion not towing the company line. Some people defended Shula. Imagine that. What agenda did they have?

Really? You bash Rivera, Hurney, Norv etc and you don't have an agenda?  My agenda? Fair evaluation good and bad. I rarely respond except when I see exaggerated posts like yours and other critics who fill every thread with biased extreme positions. If you were balanced in your posts I would have little reason to respond.

[Toomers]

9 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Really? You bash Rivera, Hurney, Norv etc and you don't have an agenda?  My agenda? Fair evaluation good and bad. I rarely respond except when I see exaggerated posts like yours and other critics who fill every thread with biased extreme positions. If you were balanced in your posts I would have little reason to respond.

And I’ve also praised and defended all of them. So what’s the problem. If someone doesn’t think exactly as you do it is incorrect. What was I out of balance on in any of this. That’s the “PC” you didn’t tell me I was wrong in the right way to make me feel better BS. 

  One of us has an agenda that affects every thought we make. Then there’s me who just judges the acts of the situation. Not the irrelevant issues used to take away from the real question. Just like all these posts to avoid the fact that the whole ordeal was a mistake. 

  When I say something false about anyone, feel free. But this sudden “you will not post negative comments” schtick by people is laughable. Dispute it or stay out of it. 

[top dawg]

What's laughable is polluting this forum with Hurney-Rivera-suck posts.

We all know how some of you feel. Why the fug do you feel the need to repeat it in so many ways? It's annoying and unproductive. Then you throw a hissy fit, telling everyone how stupid and illogical they are when they call you on it. You go over the mountain and through the woods to say the same thing over and over and over again, then try and deny it with convoluted reasoning and useless questions.

That's what's laughable.

 

 

[Toomers]

Just now, top dawg said:

What's laughable is polluting this forum with Hurney-Rivera-suck posts.

We all know how some of you feel. Why the fug do you feel the need to repeat it in so many ways? It's annoying and unproductive. Then you throw a hissy fit, telling everyone how stupid and illogical they are when they call you on it. You go over the mountain and through the woods to say the same thing over and over and over again, then try and deny it with convoluted reasoning and useless questions.

That's what's laughable.

 

 

It was much better when it was Gettleman and we got constant updates on why we should have drafted Hunter Henry. How many times did we have to hear that? Or a Philly rant? Or which crappy WR we should sign? That about cover it? We all get sick of different things. Maybe it’s your turn. Ignore it or prove it wrong. Sad to say, its going to continue. 

  Make sure you remember you have been on the opposite side of this for years. Just now, it’s not you doing the complaining. 

[top dawg]

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

It was much better when it was Gettleman and we got constant updates on why we should have drafted Hunter Henry. How many times did we have to hear that? Or a Philly rant? Or which crappy WR we should sign? That about cover it? We all get sick of different things. Maybe it’s your turn. Ignore it or prove it wrong. Sad to say, its going to continue. 

  Make sure you remember you have been on the opposite side of this for years. Just now, it’s not you doing the complaining. 

I don't complain, just think outside the box in order to try and come up with what may be solutions.  And I'd like for you to pull up ALL of these posts about Hunter Henry or anyone (maybe five tops, certainly no more than 10). You're a liar.

[Sub Zero]

13 minutes ago, Toomers said:

It was much better when it was Gettleman and we got constant updates on why we should have drafted Hunter Henry. How many times did we have to hear that? Or a Philly rant? Or which crappy WR we should sign? That about cover it? We all get sick of different things. Maybe it’s your turn. Ignore it or prove it wrong. Sad to say, its going to continue. 

  Make sure you remember you have been on the opposite side of this for years. Just now, it’s not you doing the complaining. 

BS.. Ppl would complain but after a time would fall in or atleast see what happens before playing the doom and gloom role...

For some reason ppl were way more objective with all of Gman moves..

He say Byron Bell was left handed so he should be able to play LT.. Ppl would complain for a week but than gave Dave the benefit of the doubt.. Until it blew up in our faces.. And still every offseason Dave would get a clean slate and most here would trust in Dave...

It wasn't until poo became a ongoing pattern and he was fired that ppl actually Express their true feelings and had a different retrospective of his time here..

But when Dave was our guy he was our guy and most here backed him and had hope every year.. Even when he completely fuged up...

FACTS..

[Toomers]

 

  

8 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I don't complain, just think outside the box in order to try and come up with what may be solutions.  And I'd like for you to pull up ALL of these posts about Hunter Henry or anyone (maybe five tops, certainly no more than 10). You're a liar.

They were plenty enough to get sick of. So enjoy your time dealing with it. Everyone has to when you hit that high horse and tell us how much better you are. Or one of your opinions. Denarius Moore? That’s him. 

[top dawg]

5 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 

  

They were plenty enough to get sick of. So enjoy your time dealing with it. Everyone has to when you hit that high horse and tell us how much better you are. Or one of your opinions. Denarius Moore? That’s him. 

I have never told ANYONE on this board that I was better than them at providing opinions, or that my opinions were better than theirs. Are you seriously that delusional and/or insecure? 

Moreover, I know it may be hard for you, but try and make the distinction between discussing the positives and negatives about something or someone and simply complaining about something or someone repeatedly. 

[Toomers]

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

I have never told ANYONE on this board that I was better than them at providing opinions, or that my opinions were better than theirs. Are you seriously that delusional and/or insecure? 

Moreover, I know it may be hard for you, but try and make the distinction between discussing the positives and negatives about something or someone and simply complaining about something or someone repeatedly. 

And simply complaining about something is all your doing. Telling people what to post. Can’t defend against its truth so whine that they bring it up.

   But this wasn’t a problem when people did it to Gettleman for years. When we were going to a Super Bowl. But NOW it’s an issue. Why is that? What changed? When did it become wrong to criticize the GM? I missed that meeting? 

[top dawg]

I mean, are you dumb? Me starting a thread or two about possibly bringing in Denarius Moore (and as a package deal with Jared Veldheer) is not the same as incessant bitching in one form, fashion or another. Someone bringing up a possible player does not irk people like constant bitching about what is.

[Toomers]

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I mean, are you dumb? Me starting a thread or two about possibly bringing in Denarius Moore (and as a package deal with Jared Veldheer) is not the same as incessant bitching in one form, fashion or another. Someone bringing up a possible player does not irk people like constant bitching about what is.

 I forgot. You did it. So that makes it cool. That’s my bad. 

   Like I said....Dispute it or stay out of it. But you will continue to deal with it.