Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anderson wasn't good enough for Carolina


Jmac

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Your question is pretty dumb, man...

Let me get this straight: you want to know if the people responsible for cutting CJ Anderson prematurely this year, bear responsibility for if we do poorly next season? Even though CJ Anderson was only signed to a one-year deal and in all likelihood had no chance of re-signing with us next season? Try to walk me through your logic here cause there doesn’t seem to be any.

In that case, I will answer your question: no.

It's actually such a simple question that even a person with limited intelligence can understand it, but apparently not you :)

But let's try again: If we have a losing season next year, will you blame the people in charge?

The fact that you're making excuses not to answer it tells me all I need to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, NJPanthers12 said:

Keep being dramatic. Sorry some people on here have standards and realize that Ron Rivera is a joke of a coach, and Marty Hurney is an ex-newspaper columnist who is in no way qualified for the job he holds. The guy got a total of zero interviews after being fired the first time around. 

That is nothing but dramatic overblown commentary about the distant past. Hurney did a good job last year and is ready to keep doing it this year. Your standard seems to be you hold grudges and try to blame Hurney and Rivera for everything and ignore legitimate concerns like injuries and player execution which were the real story in 2018. Fortunately Tepper knows better which is why Ron and Hurney are still here 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/13/2019 at 1:01 PM, Mr. Scot said:

It's a message board, dude. Nothing that happens here is that important. The fact that you seem to think it is tells me you're taking yourself way too seriously.

But yet he's still getting beat in the process...wonder what that feels like lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fox007 said:

But yet he's still getting beat in the process...wonder what that feels like lol

L O L

Getting beat by what? Not  simplistic-minded blowhard know-it-alls on a message board that don't understand the difference between logic and reason, facts and opinions, and get pissy, and downright patronizingly disrespectful every time someone disagrees with them about a football team. 

I have a great rep on this board, and have pretty good discussions without all the antipathy and bad feelings. Some can't say the same.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, panthers55 said:

That is nothing but dramatic overblown commentary about the distant past. Hurney did a good job last year and is ready to keep doing it this year. Your standard seems to be you hold grudges and try to blame Hurney and Rivera for everything and ignore legitimate concerns like injuries and player execution which were the real story in 2018. Fortunately Tepper knows better which is why Ron and Hurney are still here 

Again, Hurney did a less terrible job than he did previously. He cut Davis. This offseason will show everything we need to know just how terrible he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, top dawg said:

L O L

Getting beat by what? Not  simplistic-minded blowhard know-it-alls on a message board that don't understand the difference between logic and reason, facts and opinions, and get pissy, and downright patronizingly disrespectful every time someone disagrees with them about a football team. 

I have a great rep on this board, and have pretty good discussions without all the antipathy and bad feelings. Some can't say the same.

 

I love it when his minions come to protect him and wind up looking just as foolish..lol

images.jpeg.b30e97ca9fb2ee0ab05856a7f4712bc4.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Scot defense mechanism kicking in..

1. Judgemental statements..

2. Nonsensical defense of statements..

3. Patronizing comment when questioned..

4. Hypothetical backstroking..

5. Reassurance from his internet pep squad..

6. Resolution of apathy for the subject in the 1st place..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RumHam said:

Again, Hurney did a less terrible job than he did previously. He cut Davis. This offseason will show everything we need to know just how terrible he is.

I think this off-season he will do a decent job. I think among critics here, he could do a fantastic job and still be criticized because folks already have their mind made up and see what they want to see. And you can't cut someone who is not under contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I think this off-season he will do a decent job. I think among critics here, he could do a fantastic job and still be criticized because folks already have their mind made up and see what they want to see. And you can't cut someone who is not under contract. 

not me. Change my mind and make a difference. He hasn't in 15 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...