Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anderson wasn't good enough for Carolina


Jmac

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Except that you did, and still are.

Heck, at this point you're spending more time talking about me than you are talking about the team.

Guess I own you too :)

Sure I do. 

I like to entertain myself by purposefully engaging you in mental exercises (that you erroneously take for competition) in order for you to show your true self.  Your Hurney-Rivera drive-bys make it too easy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Sure I do. 

I like to entertain myself by purposefully engaging you in mental exercises (that you erroneously take for competition) in order for you to show your true self.  Your Hurney-Rivera drive-bys make it too easy.

 

So you also admit to being on a mission, one with me at the center...

Wow :eyeroll:

It's a message board, dude. Nothing that happens here is that important. The fact that you seem to think it is tells me you're taking yourself way too seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheRed said:

You follow me around threads losing your poo when I mention Gettleman. You aren't without bias.

Go sit down somewhere dude.

   If you mean I show your current agenda in a thread I’m already in, sure. Please tell us how “fair” and “unbiased” you are? I avoid you like the plague. You just don’t like facts ruining your agenda. 

But I understand in your “reality”, a person has to be on one side of the agenda or they other. No room for actually judging something on it’s merit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

So you also admit to being on a mission, one with me at the center...

Wow :eyeroll:

It's a message board, dude. Nothing that happens here is that important. The fact that you seem to think it is tells me you're taking yourself way too seriously.

You take it so seriously that you routinely use words like "silly" or "stupid" or "moronic" or...blah blah blah because people dare to have a difference of opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

You take it so seriously that you routinely use words like "silly" or "stupid" or "moronic" or...blah blah blah because people dare to have a difference of opinion. 

Nope. People are free to feel differently from me. When they can do so intelligently, I respect that.

When, however, their arguments are "silly", "stupid", or "moronic", that's when I say so.

Quick hint: Some of the people who follow me around on a mission tend to be the biggest offenders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Nope. People are free to feel differently from me. When they can do so intelligently, I respect that.

When, however, their arguments are "silly", "stupid", or "moronic", that's when I say so.

Nope, you say that regardless, and that's why you get into so many arguments with people basically telling you the same exact thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can’t read this place but for a few minutes at a time because of all this crap in practically every thread. It is always chicken little the sky is falling but has morphed from Gettleman vs Hurney to something else now because Gettleman’s moves have mostly been exposed as less than genius.

Now it is Rivera, Hurney et all. Even the new owner is a moron for not firing them both because someone missed a tackle in week 12 or something. If Rivera and Hurney made water into wine there would be a post blaming them for the wine sucking. If Turner drank it all and got loaded and lost the sheets with Anderson’s plays on it, it is somehow Rivera’s fault. And so forth and so on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, stratocatter said:

Now it is Rivera, Hurney et all. Even the new owner is a moron for not firing them both because someone missed a tackle in week 12 or something. If Rivera and Hurney made water into wine there would be a post blaming them for the wine sucking. If Turner drank it all and got loaded and lost the sheets with Anderson’s plays on it, it is somehow Rivera’s fault. And so forth and so on. 

Yo, we went from a top NFC seed to losing 7 of 8 to close the season.  The one win coming against the Saints backups after they clinched the 1st seed.  That may have something to do with it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, davos said:

Yo, we went from a top NFC seed to losing 7 of 8 to close the season.  The one win coming against the Saints backups after they clinched the 1st seed.  That may have something to do with it.  

And so may have Cam's bum shoulder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Concerning the RB load, consider that when they finally had the opportunity to see more out of CAP:

They decided to shelf him in the second half for a near 30 y/o free agency bin Travaris Cadet with a lovely 11 carriers for 17 yards.  They were just trying to run out the season at a certain point.  I think CAP is fine, not a star, but could end up jumping into a starting role if need be and producing like Damien Williams has in KC.  The Miami game the previous season showed he's got some decent ability.  

That showed that they view it as CMC 100% which is fine, I guess if it works, but it may have an effect on his longevity.

Norv has shown to be capable of using multiple guys before with Tomilson/Tolbert/Sproles so maybe it changes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...