Anderson wasn't good enough for Carolina

[Toomers]

12 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Did Smith's release make us worse initially? 

My Gettleman bashing is a conduit to counter Scot's idiotic messages he spews on a daily basis. 

So you would have no problem showing us all the numerous posts you make that don’t involve Hurney or DG? Or is every post you make because of Scot? That’s creepy.

   We’ve been here before. One of us has defended and bashed both GMs. Then there’s you. Who has one singular agenda for posting? And have the nerve to accuse others of “motives”.   

[Mr. Scot]

15 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I said in so many words that that is what you were trying to do---and that it was pathetic and not befitting of a forum member of your standing or man of your age---not that you were succeeding at it. 

"Dangerous" to the fan base? That's truly laughable! LOL

I would never give your old, tired, negative, patronizing modus operandi that kind of importance. ROFL

Except that you did, and still are.

Heck, at this point you're spending more time talking about me than you are talking about the team.

Guess I own you too 

[Toomers]

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

So you do have a mission, and it's to counteract me. And that's so important, you'll gear your posts to that specific task.

Basically, I own you 

  All that and you got your own, and highly coveted, “Modus Operandi”. Congratulations and welcome to the club!!!!

 

[Car123]

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

So you do have a mission, and it's to counteract me. And that's so important, you'll gear your posts to that specific task.

Basically, I own you 

Believe what you want, sir or madam.

[Car123]

8 minutes ago, Toomers said:

So you would have no problem showing us all the numerous posts you make that don’t involve Hurney or DG? Or is every post you make because of Scot? That’s creepy.

   We’ve been here before. One of us has defended and bashed both GMs. Then there’s you. Who has one singular agenda for posting? And have the nerve to accuse others of “motives”.   

You've never in your life bashed Gettleman. 

[Khyber53]

CJ didn't see the field simply because there was no way in heck that we were pulling CMC to the sidelines for more than a play or two each game. That wasn't because Ron Rivera was an idiot, it's because the coaching staff knew how bad Cam's arm was and how quickly it could degrade in any given game. CMC offered an out for Cam every time he dropped back whether as a receiver or a blocker. 

CJ is a good player and he had a great game last night, behind a really solid offensive line. Good to see him having so much success there and it is certainly working out for him. Keeping him here wasn't going to help us any more than what we had in place and it certainly wasn't going to help his career any. The cards certainly fell in his favor, finally, and he might well get another ring out of this. 

 

[Mr. Scot]

4 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Believe what you want, sir or madam.

I believe if we look back at your post history, you'll find a pretty significant portion of your writing is devoted to me.

What do you think that says about you? 

I also believe you weaseled out of answering my question about what happens if we aren't good next year (not a surprise).

[MasterAwesome]

25 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Because we do. And plenty of people are saying it in places other than this board.

Same question as above: If we have a lousy season next year, who gets the blame?

So then why say you don’t care how a player does on his new team?

How stupid did we look when we cut Steve Smith and he proceeded to destroy our team with 100+ yards and 2 TDs in his revenge game? And how many times did you post about it afterwards?

Considering we only signed CJ Anderson on a one-year deal, I’d have a hard time buying that cutting him this year would be the reason we suck next year, unless you think we would’ve re-signed him AND he would’ve wanted to re-sign here to ride the bench again.

[Mr. Scot]

5 minutes ago, Car123 said:

You've never in your life bashed Gettleman. 

If you believe that, then you've never in your life read his posts.

Is it too difficult to keep up with somebody else on your spending all your energy on me?

[Toomers]

Just now, Car123 said:

You've never in your life bashed Gettleman. 

 Shall I refer you to every word I’ve ever posted about Matt Kalil. No one was more pissed we signed him than I was, and I sure haven’t let up since. Unlike you, I care about the move, not who made it. And while many on here bashed Hurney for exercising the option on Kalils contract, I have continuously defended him as not having a choice and it was all on DG. I can easily pull any of those. 

   Now. Let’s see if we can find any post of yours that doesn’t directly praise Hurney or bash Gettleman. When you show that level of credibility, then you can speak. Otherwise, you just remain the one-sided troll you are. 

  

[TheRed]

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

 Shall I refer you to every word I’ve ever posted about Matt Kalil. No one was more pissed we signed him than I was, and I sure haven’t let up since. Unlike you, I care about the move, not who made it. And while many on here bashed Hurney for exercising the option on Kalils contract, I have continuously defended him as not having a choice and it was all on DG. I can easily pull any of those. 

   Now. Let’s see if we can find any post of yours that doesn’t directly praise Hurney or bash Gettleman. When you show that level of credibility, then you can speak. Otherwise, you just remain the one-sided troll you are. 

  

You follow me around threads losing your poo when I mention Gettleman. You aren't without bias.

Go sit down somewhere dude.

[luke nukem]

59 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Yep, maybe a Steve Smith away from winning it all. How ironic.

it was the cruelest fate imaginable, 15 games won without him and the only one that matters is when we needed him most. I doubt we even get to the SB with smith on the roster in 15, but I know we would have come back with a Lombardi if he had suited up for us that day.

[Mr. Scot]

2 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

So then why say you don’t care how a player does on his new team?

How stupid did we look when we cut Steve Smith and he proceeded to destroy our team with 100+ yards and 2 TDs in his revenge game? And how many times did you post about it afterwards?

Considering we only signed CJ Anderson on a one-year deal, I’d have a hard time buying that cutting him this year would be the reason we suck next year, unless you think we would’ve re-signed him AND he would’ve wanted to re-sign here to ride the bench again.

So...ducking the question (again, not a surprise)

We had a down year that year but still made the playoffs. For the record, I would have been equally happy had we made the playoffs with a bad record this year (as was discussed).

Smith? He never even approached the Super Bowl again. We were in it one year later. Anderson in the Panthers look to be on the opposite path from that result.

But since you failed to answer the question, I'll ask again: If we have a lousy season next year, do the people in charge have to bear responsibility?

 

[YoungPanthers89]

This is the same coach that saw their franchise and backup QB's playing with 1 arm and continued to put them at risk